A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias

被引:12
作者
Salway, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Wakefield, Jon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath, Avon, England
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Stat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
aggregate data; Dirichlet process prior; ecological fallacy; pure specification bias; within-area variability;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
' A major drawback of epidemiological ecological studies, in which the association between area-level summaries of risk and exposure is used to make inference about individual risk, is the difficulty in characterizing within-area variability in exposure and confounder variables. To avoid ecological bias, samples of individual exposure/confounder data within each area are required. Unfortunately, these may be difficult or expensive to obtain, particularly if large samples are required. In this paper, we propose a new approach suitable for use with small samples. We combine a Bayesian nonparametric Dirichlet process prior with an estimating functions' approach and show that this model gives a compromise between 2 previously described methods. The method is investigated using simulated data, and a practical illustration is provided through an analysis of lung cancer mortality and residential radon exposure in counties of Minnesota. We conclude that we require good quality prior information about the exposure/confounder distributions and a large between- to within-area variability ratio for an ecological study to be feasible using only small samples of individual data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
OTT WR, 1994, ENV STAT DAT ANAL
[12]  
PRENTICE RL, 1995, BIOMETRIKA, V82, P113
[13]   COMPARISON OF RELATIVE RISKS OBTAINED IN ECOLOGICAL AND INDIVIDUAL STUDIES - SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
RICHARDSON, S ;
STUCKER, I ;
HEMON, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 16 (01) :111-120
[14]  
Richardson S., 2000, SPATIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, P205
[15]  
Salway R., 2004, ECOLOGICAL INFERENCE, P303, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511510595.015, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511510595.015]
[16]  
Sheppard L, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P1849, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960915)15:17<1849::AID-SIM396>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-4
[18]   ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGIC REGRESSION IN TILE STUDY OF LUNG-CANCER AND INDOOR RADON [J].
STIDLEY, CA ;
SAMET, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (03) :312-322
[19]   Ecological inference for 2x2 tables [J].
Wakefield, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2004, 167 :385-426
[20]   A statistical framework for ecological and aggregate studies [J].
Wakefield, J ;
Salway, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2001, 164 :119-137