A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias

被引:12
作者
Salway, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Wakefield, Jon [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath, Avon, England
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Stat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
aggregate data; Dirichlet process prior; ecological fallacy; pure specification bias; within-area variability;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
' A major drawback of epidemiological ecological studies, in which the association between area-level summaries of risk and exposure is used to make inference about individual risk, is the difficulty in characterizing within-area variability in exposure and confounder variables. To avoid ecological bias, samples of individual exposure/confounder data within each area are required. Unfortunately, these may be difficult or expensive to obtain, particularly if large samples are required. In this paper, we propose a new approach suitable for use with small samples. We combine a Bayesian nonparametric Dirichlet process prior with an estimating functions' approach and show that this model gives a compromise between 2 previously described methods. The method is investigated using simulated data, and a practical illustration is provided through an analysis of lung cancer mortality and residential radon exposure in counties of Minnesota. We conclude that we require good quality prior information about the exposure/confounder distributions and a large between- to within-area variability ratio for an ecological study to be feasible using only small samples of individual data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, STAT LABS MATH STAT
[2]  
CARLIN BP, 1999, CASE STUDIES BAYESIA, V4, P303
[4]   BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF SOME NONPARAMETRIC PROBLEMS [J].
FERGUSON, TS .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1973, 1 (02) :209-230
[5]  
Field RW, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P1091, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010153
[6]   DIVERGENT BIASES IN ECOLOGIC AND INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL STUDIES [J].
GREENLAND, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (09) :1209-1223
[7]   ECOLOGICAL BIAS, CONFOUNDING, AND EFFECT MODIFICATION [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
MORGENSTERN, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (01) :269-274
[8]   ECOLOGIC STUDIES - BIASES, MISCONCEPTIONS, AND COUNTEREXAMPLES [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
ROBINS, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (08) :747-760
[9]   Improving ecological inference using individual-level data [J].
Jackson, C ;
Best, N ;
Richardson, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (12) :2136-2159
[10]  
*NAT AC SCI, 1999, HLTH EFF EXP RADO BE