A Mechanism of Intraday Market Design for Promoting Wind Power Integration

被引:7
作者
Du, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Xifan [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiuli [2 ,3 ]
Shao, Chengcheng [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Yunpeng [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Power Engn Consulting Grp Corp, Northeast Elect Power Design Inst, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Elect Insulat & Power Equipment, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
CSEE JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
Benefit analysis; electricity market; intraday market; shiftable load; wind power; DEMAND RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; PENETRATION; SYSTEM; RULES;
D O I
10.17775/CSEEJPES.2015.01030
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Wind power generation has been developing rapidly in recent years. Therefore, the mechanism for promoting wind power integration becomes increasingly important. In this paper, a novel mechanism of intraday market is proposed, which can utilize updating information of wind power and effectively exploit the shiftable load. The mechanism is compatible with the existing market framework, and promotes wind power producers (WPPs) to be more competitive in the market. Thus, the WPPs could make decisions for multiple market transactions in various trading timescales according to the market price. Moreover, the WPPs can optimize their decisions continuously in the intraday market at different time points in the model. The case study on IEEE-RTS verifies the proposed method is valid and feasible. It can support wind power integration and increase the benefit of the whole system as well.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] An Evaluation of Intraday Trading and Demand Response for a Predominantly Hydro-Wind System Under Nordic Market Rules
    Amelin, Mikael
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [2] Comparison of Wind Energy Support Policy and Electricity Market Design in Europe, the United States, and Australia
    Aparicio, Nestor
    MacGill, Iain
    Rivier Abbad, Juan
    Beltran, Hector
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 3 (04) : 809 - 818
  • [3] Strategic Offering for a Wind Power Producer
    Baringo, Luis
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) : 4645 - 4654
  • [4] Chao Du, 2014, 2014 International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON 2014), P257, DOI 10.1109/POWERCON.2014.6993598
  • [5] The impact of European balancing rules on wind power economics and on short-term bidding strategies
    Chaves-Avila, J. P.
    Hakvoort, R. A.
    Rarnos, A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 : 383 - 393
  • [6] Demand Response in an Isolated System With High Wind Integration
    Dietrich, Kristin
    Latorre, Jesus M.
    Olmos, Luis
    Ramos, Andres
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (01) : 20 - 29
  • [7] The Value of Intra-Day Markets in Power Systems With High Wind Power Penetration
    Jafari, Ali M.
    Zareipour, Hamidreza
    Schellenberg, Antony
    Amjady, Nima
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) : 1121 - 1132
  • [8] Minimization of imbalance cost trading wind power on the short-term power market
    Matevosyan, Julija
    Soder, Lennart
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2006, 21 (03) : 1396 - 1404
  • [9] Pricing Electricity in Pools With Wind Producers
    Morales, Juan M.
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    Liu, Kai
    Zhong, Jin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (03) : 1366 - 1376
  • [10] Short-Term Trading for a Wind Power Producer
    Morales, Juan M.
    Conejo, Antonio J.
    Perez-Ruiz, Juan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (01) : 554 - 564