UNDERSTANDING SALT TOLERANCE MECHANISMS IN WHEAT GENOTYPES BY EXPLORING ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES

被引:0
|
作者
Amjad, M. [1 ]
Akhtar, J. [1 ]
Haq, M. A. [1 ]
Riaz, M. A. [2 ]
Jacobsen, S. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Inst Soil & Environm Sci, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
[2] Nucl Inst Agr & Biol, Faisalabad, Pakistan
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, DK-2630 Tastrup, Denmark
来源
关键词
Salt tolerance; oxidative stress; antioxidants; wheat; SOIL-WATER DEFICITS; LONG-TERM SALINITY; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES; DEFENSE SYSTEM; STRESS; L; GROWTH; CALCIUM; PLANTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The activities of antioxidant enzymes were analyzed in six wheat genotypes under different concentrations of NaCl (0, 100 and 200 mM). Plants were harvested after either 15 or 30 days of salt stress. The most salt tolerant genotype (SARC-1) maintained lower Na+ and higher relative growth rate (RGR), shoot fresh weight (SFW), shoot-root ratio, and K+: Na+ ratio, compared to the most salt sensitive genotypes (S-9189 and S-9476). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) increased significantly in SARC-1 and SARC-2 with increasing salt stress, while there was no difference in S-9189 and S-9476. Additionally, glutathione reductase (GR) activity was decreased in salt sensitive (S-9189 and S-9476) than salt tolerant (SARC-1) genotypes. Under salt stress conditions a negative relationship between SOD and leaf Na+, and a positive between SOD and shoot fresh weight (SFW), were observed. The higher efficiency of antioxidant enzymes of tolerant genotypes could be considered as one of the factors involved in salt tolerance of wheat.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 976
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Salt tolerance of sixteen wheat genotypes during seedling growth
    Bahri Daǧdaş International Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 125, Konya, Turkey
    Turk. J. Agric. For., 2007, 6 (363-372):
  • [22] Salt tolerance of sixteen wheat genotypes during seedling growth
    Bagci, Seydi Ahmet
    Ekiz, Hasan
    Yilmaz, Ahmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2007, 31 (06) : 363 - 372
  • [23] Biochemical indices and RAPD markers for salt tolerance in wheat genotypes
    Vaja K.N.
    Gajera H.P.
    Katakpara Z.A.
    Patel S.V.
    Golakiya B.A.
    Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2016, 21 (2): : 143 - 150
  • [24] Effects of salicylic acid and salinity on apoplastic antioxidant enzymes in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance
    Mutlu, S.
    Atici, Oe
    Nalbantoglu, B.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2009, 53 (02) : 334 - 338
  • [25] EFFECTS OF DROUGHT STRESS ON ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN SEEDLINGS OF DIFFERENT WHEAT GENOTYPES
    Weng, Mingyang
    Cui, Lirong
    Liu, Fenling
    Zhang, Min
    Shan, Lun
    Yang, Shushen
    Deng, Xiping
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2015, 47 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [26] Salt Stress in Wheat: Effects, Tolerance Mechanisms, and Management
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Zahra, Noreen
    Ullah, Aman
    Nadeem, Faisal
    Rehman, Abdul
    Kapoor, Riti
    Al-Hinani, Mawra S.
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 24 (04) : 8151 - 8173
  • [27] Screening Egyptian Wheat Genotypes for Salt Tolerance at Early Growth Stages
    El-Hendawy, S. E.
    Hu, Y.
    Sakagami, J. I.
    Schmidhalter, U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2011, 5 (03) : 283 - 298
  • [28] Growth and stomatal responses of bread wheat genotypes in tolerance to salt stress
    Rahnama, Afrasyab
    Poustini, Kazem
    Tavakkol-Afshari, Reza
    Tavakoli, Afshin
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2010, 47 : 14 - 19
  • [29] Genetic variability in wheat genotypes for salt tolerance, growth and physiological responses
    Naz, Tayyaba
    Akhtar, Javaid
    Anwar-Ul-Haq, Muhammad
    Shahid, Muhammad
    SOIL & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 34 (02) : 187 - 199
  • [30] EFFECT OF HALOPRIMING ON THE INDUCTION OF NACL SALT TOLERANCE IN DIFFERENT WHEAT GENOTYPES
    Muhammad, Zahir
    Hussain, Farrukh
    Rehmanullah
    Majeed, Abdul
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2015, 47 (05) : 1613 - 1620