Measuring environmental efficiency of industry: a case study of thermal power generation in India

被引:105
作者
Murty, M. N. [1 ]
Kumar, Surender
Dhavala, Kishore K.
机构
[1] Univ Delhi, Inst Econ Growth, Delhi 110007, India
[2] TERI Univ, Dept Policy Studies, New Delhi 110003, India
关键词
environmental and technical efficiency; shadow prices of pollution; air pollution;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-006-9055-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Technical and environmental efficiency of some coal-fired thermal power plants in India is estimated using a methodology that accounts for firm's efforts to increase the production of good output and reduce pollution with the given resources and technology. The methodology used is directional output distance function. Estimates of firm-specific shadow prices of pollutants (bad outputs), and elasticity of substitution between good and bad outputs are also obtained. The technical and environmental inefficiency of a representative firm is estimated as 0.06 implying that the thermal power generating industry in Andhra Pradesh state of India could increase production of electricity by 6% while decreasing generation of pollution by 6%. This result shows that there are incentives or win-win opportunities for the firms to voluntarily comply with the environmental regulation. It is found that there is a significant variation in marginal cost of pollution abatement or shadow prices of bad outputs across the firms and an increasing marginal cost of pollution abatement with respect to pollution reduction by the firms. This result calls for the use of economic instruments like pollution taxes instead of command and control regulation used currently in India to reduce air pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 50
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: The case of Taiwan [J].
Alberini, A ;
Cropper, M ;
Fu, TT ;
Krupnick, A ;
Liu, JT ;
Shaw, D ;
Harrington, W .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 34 (02) :107-126
[2]  
[Anonymous], POLLUTION TAXES IND
[3]  
BLACKORBY C, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P882
[4]   The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants [J].
Boyd, GA ;
McClelland, JD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 38 (02) :121-142
[5]   A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: With application to European railways [J].
Coelli, T ;
Perelman, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 117 (02) :326-339
[6]   ESTIMATORS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTS FOR A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER FUNCTION - A MONTE-CARLO ANALYSIS [J].
COELLI, T .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1995, 6 (03) :247-268
[7]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[8]   The measurement of English and Welsh police force efficiency: A comparison of distance function models [J].
Drake, L ;
Simper, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :165-186
[9]  
Dziegielewska DAP, 2005, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V30, P131
[10]   ON PRICE EFFICIENCY [J].
FARE, R ;
GROSSKOPF, S ;
NELSON, J .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1990, 31 (03) :709-720