Measuring duration mismatch negativity

被引:193
作者
Jacobsen, T [1 ]
Schröger, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Inst Allgemeine Psychol, BioCog Cognit & Biol Psychol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
mismatch negativity; auditory sensory memory; preattentive change detection; sound duration; event related brain potential; electrophysiology;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00043-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Automatic comparisons of sound duration in auditory sensory memory are typically investigated by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) to standard and deviant stimuli presented in oddball blocks. Deviants elicit mismatch negativity (MMN). This procedure might overestimate an MMN contribution reflecting automatic sensory memory processes because of differential states of refractoriness of respectively recruited neural populations [Neuroreport 1996;7:3005; Psychophysiology 2001;38:723]. Here, memory-comparison-based Duration MMN contributions were investigated using various experimental protocols. Methods: Memory-comparison-based first-order Duration MMN was investigated using 4 blocked conditions: (a) descending Deviant (100 ms. P = 0.14), 150 ms Standard; (b) reverse ascending Deviant (150 ms), 100 ms Standard; (c) Control comprised of 7 equiprobable durations between 25 and 175 ms; and additionally (d) equiprobable tones between 100 and 400 ms. Using the former 3 conditions, Deviants, Standards and Controls were physically identical. Results: Comparing Deviants and Controls excluded potential refractoriness effects, and a decomposition of memory-comparison-based MMN and residual MMN was demonstrated. Genuine Duration MMN was also obtained in the deviant-standard-reverse comparison. Conclusions: Using a blocked control condition yielded equivalent results to reversing the role of deviant and standard in two separate oddball blocks. Using the reverse ascending deviant condition is thus sufficient as a control. (C) 2003 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1143
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] CEREBRAL GENERATORS OF MISMATCH NEGATIVITY (MMN) AND ITS MAGNETIC COUNTERPART (MMNM) ELICITED BY SOUND CHANGES
    ALHO, K
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (01) : 38 - 51
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, J Clin Neurophysiol, V11, P111
  • [3] Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain
    Brand, A
    Urban, A
    Grothe, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 84 (04) : 1790 - 1799
  • [4] STIMULUS REPETITION RATE FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL IN MAN
    BUTLER, RA
    SPRENG, M
    KEIDEL, WD
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 5 (06) : 665 - &
  • [5] NEURAL TUNING FOR SOUND DURATION - ROLE OF INHIBITORY MECHANISMS IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS
    CASSEDAY, JH
    EHRLICH, D
    COVEY, E
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5160) : 847 - 850
  • [6] Cortical auditory dysfunction in children with oral clefts:: relation with cleft type
    Ceponiene, R
    Hukki, J
    Cheour, M
    Haapanen, ML
    Ranta, R
    Näätänen, R
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (11) : 1921 - 1926
  • [7] Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials
    Escera, C
    Alho, K
    Schröger, E
    Winkler, I
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2000, 5 (3-4) : 151 - 166
  • [8] The individual replicability of mismatch negativity at short and long inter-stimulus intervals
    Escera, C
    Yago, E
    Polo, MD
    Grau, C
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (03) : 546 - 551
  • [9] Mismatch negativity and late auditory evoked potentials in comatose patients
    Fischer, C
    Morlet, D
    Bouchet, P
    Luaute, J
    Jourdan, C
    Salord, F
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 110 (09) : 1601 - 1610
  • [10] SEPARATE REPRESENTATION OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION IN AUDITORY SENSORY MEMORY - AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL AND DIPOLE-MODEL ANALYSIS
    GIARD, MH
    LAVIKAINEN, J
    REINIKAINEN, K
    PERRIN, F
    BERTRAND, O
    PERNIER, J
    NAATANEN, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 7 (02) : 133 - 143