Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices

被引:78
作者
Gaechter, Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Johnson, Eric J. [4 ]
Herrmann, Andreas [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] CESifo, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[3] Inst Labour Econ, Schaumburg Lippe Str 5-9, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[4] Columbia Business Sch, 514 Uris Hall, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Univ St Gallen, Inst Mobilitat, Bahnhofstr 8, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Reference-dependent preferences; Lab-in-the-field experiments; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; EXPECTED-UTILITY-THEORY; MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION; PROSPECT-THEORY; SUBJECT MISCONCEPTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; PAY-WILLINGNESS; ACCEPT GAP; FINANCIAL DECISIONS; ENDOWMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11238-021-09839-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. We present novel evidence on both in a non-student sample (660 randomly selected customers of a car manufacturer). We measure loss aversion in riskless choice in endowment effect experiments within and between subjects and find similar levels of average loss aversion in both. The subjects of the within study also participate in a simple lottery choice task which arguably measures loss aversion in risky choices. We find substantial heterogeneity in both measures of loss aversion. Loss aversion in riskless choice and loss aversion in risky choice are strongly positively correlated, but on average riskless loss aversion is higher than risky loss aversion. We find that in both choice tasks, loss aversion increases in age, income, and wealth, and decreases in education. Our results provide novel supportive input to the debate about the reality of loss aversion.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 624
页数:26
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
L'Haridon, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 36 (03) :245-266
[3]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[4]   The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions over the Life Cycle and Implications for Regulation [J].
Agarwal, Sumit ;
Gabaix, Xavier ;
Driscoll, John C. ;
Laibson, David .
BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, 2009, (02) :51-117
[5]   Evolutionary Origins of the Endowment Effect: Evidence from Hunter-Gatherers [J].
Apicella, Coren L. ;
Azevedo, Eduardo M. ;
Christakis, Nicholas A. ;
Fowler, James H. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (06) :1793-1805
[6]   Searching for the Reference Point [J].
Baillon, Aurelien ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Spinu, Vitalie .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (01) :93-112
[7]   Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration [J].
Bateman, I ;
Kahneman, D ;
Munro, A ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (08) :1561-1580
[8]   A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences [J].
Bateman, I ;
Munro, A ;
Rhodes, B ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :479-505
[9]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[10]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92