The Rise and Fall of Ethnoterritorial Federalism: A Comparison of the Soviet Union (Russia), China, and India

被引:6
作者
Matsuzato, Kimitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Law & Polit, Bunkyo Ku, Hongo 7-3-1, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09668136.2017.1374056
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The early Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China (PRC), and independent India inherited vast territories and multi-ethnic populations from the preceding empires. Their maintenance was a political and administrative challenge. The Soviet Union devised an archetype of ethnoterritorial federalism, in which nationality groups were granted their own administrative territories and subnational governments. The PRC and India imitated this system selectively, aware of its dangerous centrifugal tendency. The collapse of the Soviet Union discredited ethnoterritorial federalism, but none of the three countries has since devised a new system of multinational integration to replace it.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1069
页数:23
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abdrakhmanov R., 2003, NA PUTI K PEREPISI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, NATION NATL
[3]  
Baluba I. A., 1997, THESIS
[4]  
Beissinger MarkR., 2002, Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State
[5]  
Blauvelt T., 2014, EUROPE-ASIA STUD, V66, P6
[6]  
Brubaker Rogers., 1996, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511558764
[7]  
Buttino Marco., 2014, RUSSIAS GREAT WAR RE, P109
[8]  
Cadiot Juliette, 2007, LAB IMPERIAL RUSSIE
[9]  
Gabdrafikov I., 2003, NA PUTI K PEREPISI
[10]  
GORENBURG D, 2006, REBOUNDING IDENTITIE