Influence of Epidural Ropivacaine with or without Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction after Thoraco-Lumbar Spine Instrumentation: A Randomized, Comparative, and Double-Blind Study

被引:5
作者
Qureshi, Faisal [1 ]
Meena, Shyam Charan [1 ]
Kumar, Vishal [2 ]
Jain, Kajal [1 ]
Chauhan, Rajeev [1 ]
Luthra, Ankur [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Sect 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Thoracolumbar spine surgery; Epidural analgesia; Dexmedetomidine; Pedicle screw fixation; Postoperative pain; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANESTHESIA; CLONIDINE; EFFICACY; INFUSION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2020.0072
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind study. Purpose: Thoraco-lumbar spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and can cause chronic pain. We aimed to compare the impact of epidural ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia after thoracolumbar spine instrumentation wherein an epidural catheter was placed by the surgeon intraoperatively. Overview of Literature: Very few studies have reported the use of epidural dexmedetomidine in spine surgeries. When used via the epidural route, dexmedetomidine is safe and efficacious and is associated with reduced rescue analgesia consumption, increased duration of analgesia, reduced pain scores, but not with major hemodynamic adverse effects. Methods: Total 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III adult patients aged 18-65 years who were scheduled to undergo thoraco-lumbar spine instrumentation were randomly allocated into group RD (epidural ropivacaine+dexmedetomidine) or group R (epidural ropivacaine plus saline). We aimed to compare the total rescue analgesic consumption on postoperative day 0, 1, and 2. Moreover, we studied the time to first rescue analgesia with visual analogue scale score <4 and the overall patient satisfaction scores. Results: There was no difference between the demographic characteristics of the two groups. The mean value of total rescue analgesia consumption was 162.5 +/- 68.4 mg in the RD group and 247.5 +/- 48.8 mg in the R group. The mean time to first rescue analgesia was 594.6 +/- 83.0 minutes in the RD group and 103.6 +/- 53.2 minutes in the R group. The mean patient satisfaction score was 4.2 +/- 0.7 in the RD group and 3.2 +/- 0.6 in the R group. No patient had any respiratory depression or prolonged motor blockade during the postoperative period. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superior efficacy, in terms of postoperative analgesia and patient satisfaction scores, of epidural ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine over that of ropivacaine alone in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar spine.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 332
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A comparative study in the post-operative spine surgeries: Epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with clonidine for post-operative analgesia [J].
Babu, M. S. Saravana ;
Verma, Anil Kumar ;
Agarwal, Apurva ;
Tyagi, Chitra M. S. ;
Upadhyay, Manoj ;
Tripathi, Shivshenkar .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 57 (04) :371-376
[2]   Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries [J].
Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh ;
Arora, Vikramjit ;
Kaur, Jasbir ;
Singh, Amarjit ;
Parmar, S. S. .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (04) :365-370
[3]   Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation [J].
Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh ;
Bajwa, Sukhwinder Kaur ;
Kaur, Jasbir ;
Singh, Gurpreet ;
Arora, Vikramjit ;
Gupta, Sachin ;
Kulshrestha, Ashish ;
Parmar, S. S. ;
Singh, Anita ;
Goraya, S. P. S. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 55 (02) :116-+
[4]  
Benyamin R, 2008, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V11, pS105
[5]   The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery [J].
Bianconi, M ;
Ferraro, L ;
Ricci, R ;
Zanoli, G ;
Antonelli, T ;
Giulia, B ;
Guberti, A ;
Massari, L .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (01) :166-172
[6]  
Chiruvella Sunil, 2018, Anesth Essays Res, V12, P103, DOI 10.4103/aer.AER_207_17
[7]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAMUSCULAR DEXMEDETOMIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN ADULT HUMAN VOLUNTEERS [J].
DYCK, JB ;
MAZE, M ;
HAACK, C ;
VUORILEHTO, L ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 78 (05) :813-820
[8]   Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion [J].
Fisher, CG ;
Belanger, L ;
Gofton, EG ;
Umedaly, HS ;
Noonan, VK ;
Abramson, C ;
Wing, PC ;
Brown, J ;
Dvorak, MF .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (08) :739-743
[9]   Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention [J].
Gan, Tong J. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 :2287-2298
[10]  
Ganter MT, 2014, PERIOPER MED, V3, DOI 10.1186/s13741-014-0010-8