Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connectedness with Health Care Providers Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

被引:1
作者
Phillips, Celeste R. [1 ]
Haase, Joan E. [1 ]
Bakoyannis, Giorgos [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, 600 Barnhill Dr NU E425, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
connectedness; communication; patient-provider relationship; resilience; ILLNESS MODEL; RESILIENCE;
D O I
10.1089/jayao.2019.0067
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Purposes of this study were to (1) develop an instrument of connectedness with health care providers (HCPs) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer (ages 13 to 21 years); (2) evaluate the content validity of the instrument through expert panels; (3) assess the dimensionality of the instrument; (4) evaluate the internal consistency reliability of the instrument; and (5) evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the instrument through hypothesis testing. Methods: The Connectedness with HCPs Scale (C-HCPS) was developed and evaluated in two phases. Phase I involved generating items, having two expert panels (AYAs and clinicians; n = 13) evaluate the items for content validity, and pretesting the instrument before pilot testing (n = 6). In phase II, the psychometric properties of the instrument (dimensionality, internal consistency reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity) were evaluated (n = 101). Results: The initial exploratory factor analysis revealed that the items separated into two separate instruments. In addition to the C-HCPS, a Disconnectedness with HCPs Scale (D-HCPS) was revealed. The C-HCPS contains 35 items and the D-HCPS contains 11 items. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a five-factor solution for the C-HCPS and a two-factor solution for the D-HCPS. Internal consistency reliability of the C-HCPS and D-HCPS was 0.0964 and 0.0881, respectively. Good evidence of convergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated through hypothesis testing. Conclusion: Findings indicate that the C-HCPS and D-HCPS are both reliable instruments with good evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Further exploration of these instruments using confirmatory factor analysis in a larger sample is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Brennan K, 1998, ATTACHMENT THEORY CL, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020
  • [2] Campell A., 1976, The quality of American life
  • [3] The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years
    Cella, David
    Yount, Susan
    Rothrock, Nan
    Gershon, Richard
    Cook, Karon
    Reeve, Bryce
    Ader, Deborah
    Fries, James F.
    Bruce, Bonnie
    Rose, Mattias
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) : S3 - S11
  • [4] The Resilience in Illness Model Part 2: Confirmatory Evaluation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
    Haase, Joan E.
    Kintner, Eileen K.
    Robb, Sheri L.
    Stump, Timothy E.
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Phillips, Celeste
    Stegenga, Kristin A.
    Burns, Debra S.
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2017, 40 (06) : 454 - 463
  • [5] The Resilience in Illness Model, Part 1 Exploratory Evaluation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
    Haase, Joan E.
    Kintner, Eileen K.
    Monahan, Patrick O.
    Robb, Sheri L.
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2014, 37 (03) : E1 - E12
  • [6] ABBREVIATED INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE HOPE - DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION
    HERTH, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1992, 17 (10) : 1251 - 1259
  • [7] An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales
    Irwin, Debra E.
    Stucky, Brian
    Langer, Michelle M.
    Thissen, David
    DeWitt, Esi Morgan
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    Varni, James W.
    Yeatts, Karin
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (04) : 595 - 607
  • [8] JALOWIEC A, 1984, NURS RES, V33, P157
  • [9] LYNN MR, 1986, NURS RES, V35, P382
  • [10] Marshall G., 1994, PATIENT SATISFACTION