Applications of GORE-TEX implants in rhinoplasty reexamined after 17 years

被引:41
作者
Conrad, Krzysztof [1 ]
Torgerson, Cory Stephen [1 ]
Gillman, Grant S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archfaci.10.4.224
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the efficacy of GORE-TEX (W. L. Gore & Associates Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) alloplast in rhinoplasty. Design: A 17-year retrospective medical chart review at a teaching hospital, community hospital, and private facial cosmetic surgery center. A total of 521 patients (122 male and 399 female; age range, 13-70 years) were followed for 12 months to 17 years. All patients had undergone GORE-TEX implantation rhinoplasty (685 implants in 158 primary procedures and 508 secondary procedures) performed by 1 surgeon. Patient satisfaction, expressed with respect to desired cosmetic benefit and functional outcome, and physician assessment, based on aesthetic improvement, technical considerations, and complications, were evaluated. Results were assessed according to the follow-up notes in the medical chart reflecting patients' and surgeon's comments and full preoperative and postoperative photographic documentation. Results: GORE-TEX alloplasts, 1 to 10 mm thick, implanted in the nasal dorsum (n = 264), lateral nasal wall (n = 252), supratip dorsum (n = 85), and premaxilla (n=84) showed excellent stability and tissue tolerance. Biological complications that required implant removal occurred in 1.9% of patients and included infection, soft tissue swelling, migration, and extrusion. Conclusions: With the exception of the nasal tip, columella, or problems in which corrections would require rigidity of the grafted or implanted material, the GORE-TEX alloplast is a safe, inexpensive, and predictable alternative to autografts. In the present series, more than 95% of implants used were 1 to 4 mm thick. In the remaining 5%, 6 implants ranged from 8 to 10 mm thick, and we found them acceptable. It is our opinion that for both primary and secondary rhinoplasty with adequate endonasal and external soft tissue coverage, GORE-TEX should be strongly considered for major and minor corrections of the nasal wall and bridge in properly selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Boyce B, 1982, BIOL SYNTHETIC VASCU, P5553
[2]  
BROWN BL, 1979, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V105, P605
[3]  
Conrad K, 1998, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V101, P1675, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199805000-00040
[4]  
CONRAD K, 1994, AM J COSMETIC SURG, V11, P111
[5]   SoftForm facial implants [J].
Davis, GM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 101 (07) :1988-1989
[6]   Gore-Tex facial implants [J].
Garner, WL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (07) :1899-1900
[7]  
Godin M S, 1999, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V1, P118, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.1.2.118
[8]  
GODIN MS, 1995, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V121, P1131
[9]   BACTERIAL ADHERENCE TO BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE - THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ITS ROLE IN CLINICAL SEPSIS [J].
GRISTINA, AG ;
COSTERTON, JW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (02) :264-273
[10]  
Ham Jongwook, 2003, Facial Plast Surg, V19, P331