A Population-Based Study of Unexplained/Lone Atrial Fibrillation: Temporal Trends, Management, and Outcomes

Background: Previous studies on lone/unexplained atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) did not exclude patients with contemporary secondary AF triggers. We characterized unexplained AF using a strict definition, and compared it to secondary AF.Methods: In this population-based study, unexplained AF was defined by the lack of any identifiable triggering medical/surgical diagnosis. Comparisons by AF type (unexplained vs secondary), age-of-onset (< / > 65 years), and sex were undertaken. Data were acquired by linking 6 population databases maintained by the Alberta Ministry of Health over a 9-year period (April 2006 to March 2015). The primary composite outcome of stroke, transient ischemic attack, thromboembolism, and/or death was assessed.Results: There were 33,150 incident AF diagnoses identified, including 1145 patients (3.5%) with unexplained AF, 931 (81.2%) of whom were aged < 65 years (2.8% of diagnoses, and 79% male). Patients with unexplained AF less often received rate/rhythm-control drugs (P < 0.0001), but they more often underwent electrical cardioversion (P < 0.0001) vs secondary AF patients. Men were younger at unexplained AF diagnosis (45 [interquartile range: 34-59] vs 58 [inter quartile range: 40-69] years; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age at diagnosis, there were no sex-based differences in the primary outcome. Event-free survival in young unexplained AF (age < 65 years) was 99.4% at 1 year and 98.3% at 3 years. At 3 years, hospitalization(s)/emergency visit(s) for noncardiovascular reasons and for AF occurred in 56.6% and 23.8% of these patients, respectively.Conclusions: Using a strict contemporary definition of unexplained AF, this study shows that the condition is rare, predominantly male, and has excellent event-free survival. However, the high rate of acute hospital utilization after diagnosis is concerning.