Developing a Prognostic Gene Panel of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients by a Machine Learning Model

被引:18
作者
Lu, Tzu-Pin [1 ]
Kuo, Kuan-Ting [2 ]
Chen, Ching-Hsuan [1 ]
Chang, Ming-Cheng [3 ,4 ]
Lin, Hsiu-Ping [3 ]
Hu, Yu-Hao [3 ]
Chiang, Ying-Cheng [3 ,5 ]
Cheng, Wen-Fang [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Chi-An [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei 10041, Taiwan
[4] Inst Nucl Energy Res, Atom Energy Council, Execut Yuan, Taoyuan 32546, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Yunlin Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Touliu 64041, Yunlin, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Oncol, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
关键词
chemotherapy; microarray; ovarian cancer; predictive model; machine learning; PLATINUM SENSITIVITY; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; BIOMARKERS; BEVACIZUMAB; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.3390/cancers11020270
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Epithelial ovarian cancer patients usually relapse after primary management. We utilized the support vector machine algorithm to develop a model for the chemo-response using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and validated the model in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the GSE9891 dataset. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of the model using ovarian cancer patients from our institute. The 10-gene predictive model demonstrated that the high response group had a longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (log-rank test, p = 0.015 for TCGA, p = 0.013 for GSE9891 and p = 0.039 for NTUH) and overall survival (OS) (log-rank test, p = 0.002 for TCGA and p = 0.016 for NTUH). In a multivariate Cox hazard regression model, the predictive model (HR: 0.644, 95% CI: 0.436-0.952, p = 0.027) and residual tumor size < 1 cm (HR: 0.312, 95% CI: 0.170-0.573, p < 0.001) were significant factors for recurrence. The predictive model (HR: 0.511, 95% CI: 0.334-0.783, p = 0.002) and residual tumor size < 1 cm (HR: 0.252, 95% CI: 0.128-0.496, p < 0.001) were still significant factors for death. In conclusion, the patients of high response group stratified by the model had good response and favourable prognosis, whereas for the patients of medium to low response groups, introduction of other drugs or clinical trials might be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploring Prognostic Gene Factors in Breast Cancer via Machine Learning
    Ma, Qinglan
    Chen, Lei
    Feng, Kaiyan
    Guo, Wei
    Huang, Tao
    Cai, Yu-Dong
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS, 2024, 62 (06) : 5022 - 5050
  • [42] Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Grimm, Christoph
    Harter, Philipp
    Prader, Sonia
    Traut, Alexander
    Heitz, Florian
    du Bois, Andreas
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (03) : 435 - 440
  • [43] Parity as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Khalafi-Nezhad, Abolfazl
    Ebrahimi, Vahid
    Ahmadpour, Fatemeh
    Momtahan, Mozhdeh
    Robati, Minoo
    Saraf, Zahra
    Ramzi, Mani
    Jowkar, Zahra
    Ghaffari, Parvin
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 1447 - 1456
  • [44] Long-term results and prognostic factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Brun, JL
    Feyler, A
    Chêne, G
    Saurel, J
    Brun, G
    Hocké, C
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [45] A prognostic risk model for ovarian cancer based on gene expression profiles from gene expression omnibus database
    Fan, Wei
    Chen, Xiaoyun
    Li, Ruiping
    Zheng, Rongfang
    Wang, Yunyun
    Guo, Yuzhen
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS, 2023, 61 (01) : 138 - 150
  • [46] Prognostic factors in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with radiation therapy
    Kosaka, Nobuaki
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Kiuchi, Kaori
    Motegi, Emi
    Ejima, Yasuo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [47] Machine learning use in early ovarian cancer detection
    Emmanuel Kokori
    Nicholas Aderinto
    Gbolahan Olatunji
    Israel Charles Abraham
    Rosemary Komolafe
    Bonaventure Ukoaka
    Owolabi Samuel
    Chidiogo Ezenwoba
    Ebuka Kennedy Anyachebelu
    [J]. Discover Medicine, 2 (1):
  • [48] CDH1, DLEC1 and SFRP5 methylation panel as a prognostic marker for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Lin, Han-Wei
    Fu, Chi-Feng
    Chang, Ming-Cheng
    Lu, Tzu-Pin
    Lin, Hsiu-Ping
    Chiang, Ying-Cheng
    Chen, Chi-An
    Cheng, Wen-Fang
    [J]. EPIGENOMICS, 2018, 10 (11) : 1397 - 1413
  • [49] Patterns of clinicopathological features and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: 35 years of prospectively collected data
    Irodi, A.
    Rye, T.
    Herbert, K.
    Churchman, M.
    Bartos, C.
    Mackean, M.
    Nussey, F.
    Herrington, C. S.
    Gourley, C.
    Hollis, R. L.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 127 (11) : 1409 - 1420
  • [50] Risk factors and prognostic factors in patients with double primary cancer: Epithelial ovarian cancer and breast cancer
    Cvelbar, M
    Ursic-Vrscaj, M
    Rakar, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) : 59 - 63