Developing a Prognostic Gene Panel of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients by a Machine Learning Model

被引:18
作者
Lu, Tzu-Pin [1 ]
Kuo, Kuan-Ting [2 ]
Chen, Ching-Hsuan [1 ]
Chang, Ming-Cheng [3 ,4 ]
Lin, Hsiu-Ping [3 ]
Hu, Yu-Hao [3 ]
Chiang, Ying-Cheng [3 ,5 ]
Cheng, Wen-Fang [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Chi-An [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei 10041, Taiwan
[4] Inst Nucl Energy Res, Atom Energy Council, Execut Yuan, Taoyuan 32546, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Yunlin Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Touliu 64041, Yunlin, Taiwan
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Oncol, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
关键词
chemotherapy; microarray; ovarian cancer; predictive model; machine learning; PLATINUM SENSITIVITY; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; BIOMARKERS; BEVACIZUMAB; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.3390/cancers11020270
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Epithelial ovarian cancer patients usually relapse after primary management. We utilized the support vector machine algorithm to develop a model for the chemo-response using the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and validated the model in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the GSE9891 dataset. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of the model using ovarian cancer patients from our institute. The 10-gene predictive model demonstrated that the high response group had a longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) (log-rank test, p = 0.015 for TCGA, p = 0.013 for GSE9891 and p = 0.039 for NTUH) and overall survival (OS) (log-rank test, p = 0.002 for TCGA and p = 0.016 for NTUH). In a multivariate Cox hazard regression model, the predictive model (HR: 0.644, 95% CI: 0.436-0.952, p = 0.027) and residual tumor size < 1 cm (HR: 0.312, 95% CI: 0.170-0.573, p < 0.001) were significant factors for recurrence. The predictive model (HR: 0.511, 95% CI: 0.334-0.783, p = 0.002) and residual tumor size < 1 cm (HR: 0.252, 95% CI: 0.128-0.496, p < 0.001) were still significant factors for death. In conclusion, the patients of high response group stratified by the model had good response and favourable prognosis, whereas for the patients of medium to low response groups, introduction of other drugs or clinical trials might be beneficial.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ovarian failure risk in post-pubertal patients with cancer: a prognostic model
    Cioffi, Raffaella
    Fais, Maria Luisa
    Bergamini, Alice
    Vanni, Valeria Stella
    Pagliardini, Luca
    Papaleo, Enrico
    Mangili, Giorgia
    Candiani, Massimo
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (19) : 2391 - 2400
  • [32] A Prognostic Model Based on Metabolism-Related Genes for Patients with Ovarian Cancer
    Dong, Jian
    Zhai, Lianghao
    Gao, Yunge
    Chen, Ligang
    Chen, Biliang
    Lv, Xiaohui
    DOKLADY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2023, 510 (01) : 110 - 122
  • [33] Identification of a Novel Prognostic Classification Model in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer by Cluster Analysis
    Chen, Kelie
    Niu, Yuequn
    Wang, Shengchao
    Fu, Zhiqin
    Lin, Hui
    Lu, Jiaoying
    Meng, Xinyi
    Yang, Bowen
    Zhang, Honghe
    Wu, Yihua
    Xia, Dajing
    Lu, Weiguo
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 6251 - 6259
  • [34] A prognostic model for ovarian cancer
    T G Clark
    M E Stewart
    D G Altman
    H Gabra
    J F Smyth
    British Journal of Cancer, 2001, 85 : 944 - 952
  • [35] A prognostic model for ovarian cancer
    Clark, TG
    Stewart, ME
    Altman, DG
    Gabra, H
    Smyth, JF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (07) : 944 - 952
  • [36] Defining a prognostic marker panel for patients with ovarian serous carcinoma effusion
    Davidson, Ben
    Smith, Yoav
    Nesland, Jahn M.
    Kaern, Janne
    Reich, Reuven
    Trope, Claes G.
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 44 (11) : 2449 - 2460
  • [37] The BRCA Gene in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Sanchez-Lorenzo, Luisa
    Salas-Benito, Diego
    Villamayor, Julia
    Patino-Garcia, Ana
    Gonzalez-Martin, Antonio
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [38] Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study
    Clark, TG
    Altman, DG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [39] Establishment of multiple machine learning prognostic model for gene differences between primary tumors and lymph nodes in luminal breast cancer
    Yue, Meng
    Zhao, Jianing
    Wu, Si
    Cai, Lijing
    Wang, Xinran
    Jia, Ying
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Wang, Yongjun
    Liu, Yueping
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, : 365 - 376
  • [40] A machine learning model for the early prediction of ovarian cancer using real world data
    de la Oliva Roque, Victor Manuel
    Esteban-Medina, Alberto
    Alejos Collado, Laura
    Louceras Munecas, Carlos
    Munoyerro-Muniz, Dolores
    Villegas, Roman
    Dopazo Blazquez, Joaquin
    FEBS OPEN BIO, 2024, 14 : 14 - 14