Comparison of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Intravenous and Intramuscular Injection of Ketamine for Children Requiring Sedation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study

被引:0
作者
Forouzan, Arash [1 ]
Moezzi, Meisam [1 ]
Aghdam, Vahid [1 ,2 ]
Delirrooyfard, Ali [1 ]
Masoumi, Kambiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Dept Emergency Med, Fac Med, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Ahvaz, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD | 2019年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Children; Efficacy; Emergency Department; Sedation; Ketamine; PEDIATRIC PROCEDURAL SEDATION; EMERGENCY; ANALGESIA; PAIN; AGITATION; RELIEF; IV;
D O I
10.22038/ijp.2018.37034.3226
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Ketamine is an antagonist receptor of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and phencyclidine derivate sedative agent. Thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) injection of Ketamine for sedation procedure of children. Materials and Methods In this randomized clinical trial the patients, 1-6 year-old children referred to Emergency Department of Ahvaz Golestan and Imam Khomeini Hospitals, Ahvaz city, Iran, were divided randomly into two groups (IV and IM groups). Patients in the IV group received ketamine with dose of 1.5 mg/kg intravenously and the patients in the IM group received ketamine with dose of 4 mg/kg intramuscularly. Then efficacy and side effects in both groups were performed every 5 minutes for the first for the first 15 minutes. Results 222 patients with indication for sedation were enrolled. Results showed that in 1st min, most of the patients that received IM ketamine were in level 1 of sedation (67.6 %, n=73); while the majority of patients that received IV ketamine were in level 1 to 3 of sedation (28.9%, 24.6% and 26.3%, respectively) (P<0.001). Moreover, in 5th min, most of the patients that received IV ketamine were in level 6 of sedation (62.3%), while those who received IM ketamine were in level 5 of sedation (52.8%) (P<0.001), which was better in IV group. While in 15th min, we did not find significant differences between the groups (P=0.057). Conclusion The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of IV ketamine in making better sedation levels in pediatric patients for different purpose (medical and para-clinical procedures).
引用
收藏
页码:9391 / 9397
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A comparative study of intranasal desmopressin and intranasal ketamine for pain management in renal colic patients: a randomized double-blind clinical trial [J].
Heydari, Farhad ;
Azizkhani, Reza ;
Majidinejad, Saeed ;
Zamani, Majid ;
Norouzian, Aref .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 11 (01) :51-58
[42]   Low-dose intravenous ketamine versus intravenous ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic in an emergency setting: a double-blind randomized clinical trial [J].
Sotoodehnia, Mehran ;
Farmahini-Farahani, Mozhgan ;
Safaie, Arash ;
Rasooli, Fatemeh ;
Baratloo, Alireza .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 32 (02) :97-104
[43]   A randomized double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal esketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in young children [J].
Nikula, Anna ;
Lundeberg, Stefan ;
Ryd Rinder, Malin ;
Laaperi, Mitja ;
Sandholm, Katri ;
Castren, Maaret ;
Kurland, Lisa .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 32 (01)
[44]   Subtenon versus intravenous Dexmedetomidine injection for postoperative analgesia in infantile cataract surgery: double-blind randomized clinical trial [J].
Ali, Wesam Nashat ;
Sayed, Jehan Ahmed ;
Amir, Maram M. ;
Aly, Mohamed Omar M. ;
Abdel-Rady, Marwa Mahmoud ;
Kamel, Emad Zarief .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 36 (01) :243-249
[45]   Dexmedetomidine compared to ketofol for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial [J].
Hussien, Rania Maher ;
Emam, Dalia Fahmy ;
Shoukry, Aktham Adel .
ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 26 (05) :595-601
[46]   Addition of low-dose ketamine to midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial [J].
Tuncali, Bahattin ;
Pekcan, Yonca Ozvardar ;
Celebi, Arzu ;
Zeyneloglu, Pinar .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2015, 27 (04) :301-306
[47]   Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine with ketofol and ketofol alone on quality of sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial [J].
Chakravarty, Reena ;
Goyal, Neha ;
Kumar, Rakesh ;
Mohammed, Sadik ;
Kamal, Manoj ;
Chhabra, Swati ;
Bhatia, Pradeep .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (04) :521-527
[48]   Efficacy of Oral Midazolam for Sedation and Amnesia in Preschool Children with Dental Anxiety: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Binh, Nguyen Quang ;
Ngoc, Vo Truong Nhu ;
Khanh, Pham Quoc ;
Huyen, Nguyen Phuong ;
Linh, Trinh Khanh ;
Khanh, Pham Phuc ;
Anh, Le Kha .
DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2025, 13 (07)
[49]   Efficacy of Postoperative Analgesia of Local Ketamine Wound Instillation Following Total Thyroidectomy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial [J].
Abd EL-Rahman, Ahmad M. ;
El Sherif, Fatma A. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 34 (01) :53-58
[50]   Dexmedetomidine-propofol versus ketamine-propofol for sedation of cancer patients undergoing computerized tomography guided bone biopsy: a randomized double-blind trial [J].
Abdelgalil, Ahmed Salah ;
Mohammed, Ahmed Mansour ;
Abdelrahman, Ayman Sharawy ;
Zayed, Norma Osama Abdallah .
ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 28 (05) :809-815