Conveying Trustworthiness to Online Consumers Reactions to Consensus, Physical Store Presence, Brand Familiarity, and Generalized Suspicion

被引:138
作者
Benedicktus, Ray L. [1 ]
Brady, Michael K. [2 ]
Darke, Peter R. [3 ]
Voorhees, Clay M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Coll Business & Econ, Fullerton, CA 92831 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[4] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Bricks and mortar; Physical presence; Brand familiarity; Suspicion; Trust; Online retailing; TRUST; INTERNET; LOYALTY; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jretai.2010.04.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Etailers have been losing market share to brick and mortar retailers that also sell products online Two related studies investigate means by which etailers can convey trustworthiness to consumers and thereby increase purchase intentions relative to hybrid firms Study 1 examines whether consensus information (i e the extent of satisfaction agreement among previous customers) and brand familiarity exert independent or interactive effects on consumer perceptions across retailers that possess or lack a physical presence Study 2 tests a potential boundary condition of the effects of consensus information and brand familiarity by introducing generalized suspicion which is a common condition for online buyers Results suggest that consensus information provides a broad cue that conveys trustworthiness and leads to greater purchase intentions for both familiar and unfamiliar brands, as well as hybrid and etailer firms In comparison, the effects of physical presence and brand familiarity were somewhat narrower m scope However we find that consensus information alone is not sufficient to buffer against active generalized suspicions online Instead a combination of high consensus and brand familiarity is necessary for this purpose The paper concludes with recommendations on how etailers can convey trustworthiness in online exchanges and how future research can build upon these findings 2010 New York University Published by Elsevier Inc All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 335
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Measuring brand equity across products and markets [J].
Aaker, DA .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 38 (03) :102-&
[2]   How good gets better and bad gets worse: Understanding the impact of affect on evaluations of known brands [J].
Adaval, R .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (03) :352-367
[3]   Using Lexical Semantic Analysis to Derive Online Brand Positions: An Application to Retail Marketing Research [J].
Aggarwal, Praveen ;
Vaidyanathan, Rajiv ;
Venkatesh, Alladi .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2009, 85 (02) :145-158
[4]   Trustmarks, objective-source ratings, and implied investments in advertising: Investigating online trust and the context-specific nature of Internet signals [J].
Aiken, K. Damon ;
Boush, David M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (03) :308-323
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[6]   Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior [J].
Ba, SL ;
Pavlou, PA .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2002, 26 (03) :243-268
[7]   The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry:: empirical insights from eBay auctions [J].
Bajari, P ;
Hortaçsu, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 34 (02) :329-355
[8]  
Ballester Elena Delgado, 2004, EUR J MARKETING, V38, P592
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all Web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study [J].
Bart, Y ;
Shankar, V ;
Sultan, F ;
Urban, GL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (04) :133-152