Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

被引:13
|
作者
Yonekura, Syuji [1 ]
Okamoto, Yoshitaka [1 ,2 ]
Sakurai, Daiju [1 ]
Iinuma, Tomohisa [1 ]
Sakurai, Toshioki [1 ,3 ]
Yoneda, Riyo [1 ]
Kurita, Junya [1 ]
Hanazawa, Toyoyuki [1 ]
Kawasaki, Yohei [4 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chiba, Japan
[2] Chiba Rosai Hosp, Chiba, Japan
[3] Chiba Canc Ctr, Chiba, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Biostat Sect, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Desloratadine; Levocetirizine; Japanese cedar pollen; Allergic rhinitis; Environmental challenge chamber; Randomized; Placebo controlled; Crossover; Double-blind study; HISTAMINE-INDUCED WHEAL; CHRONIC SPONTANEOUS URTICARIA; NONSEDATING H1-ANTIHISTAMINES; PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT; FLARE RESPONSE; ANTIHISTAMINE; CHALLENGE; SYMPTOMS; THERAPY; PHARMACOGENETICS;
D O I
10.1159/000503065
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: No comparative study of antihistamines that differ in structural system has been conducted in allergic rhinitis. Objective: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparative study to verify the efficacy of antihistamines that differ in structural system. Methods: A total of 50 patients with moderate or more severe Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive either placebo, desloratadine 5 mg (a tricyclic), or levocetirizine 5 mg (a piperazine). One dose of the study drug was orally administered at 9 pm on the day before a pollen exposure test, which was performed for 3 h (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to assess symptoms in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). Nasal and ocular symptoms were compared at an airborne pollen level of 8,000 grains/m(3). The primary endpoint was mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 120 to 180 min in the ECC. Subjects with a difference of >= 1 in TNSS between 2 drugs were extracted to the relevant drug-responsive group. Results: The difference in TNSS from placebo was -2.42 (p < 0.0001) with levocetirizine and -1.66 (p < 0.01) with desloratadine, showing that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but with no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs. There were 12 subjects in the desloratadine-responsive group and 24 subjects in the levocetirizine-responsive group, with no contributor to response was detected. Conclusion: Levocetirizine tended to control nasal symptoms more effectively than desloratadine. However, the response to each antihistamine varied among individuals and the predictors to the response are unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The specific IgE reactivity pattern of weed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis patients
    Han, Demin
    Lai, Xuxin
    Gjesing, Birgitte
    Zhong, Nanshan
    Zhang, Luo
    Spangfort, Michael D.
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2011, 131 (05) : 533 - 538
  • [33] Omalizumab is more effective than suplatast tosilate in the treatment of Japanese cedar pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Nagakura, T.
    Ogino, S.
    Okubo, K.
    Sato, N.
    Takahashi, M.
    Ishikawa, T.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2008, 38 (02): : 329 - 337
  • [34] A direct comparison of efficacy between desloratadine and rupatadine in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Lukat, K. F.
    Rivas, P.
    Roger, A.
    Kowalski, M. L.
    Botzen, U.
    Wessel, F.
    Sanquer, F.
    Agache, I.
    Izquierdo, I.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, 2013, 6 : 31 - 39
  • [35] Efficacy of buffered hypertonic saline nasal irrigation in children with symptomatic allergic rhinitis: A randomized double-blind study
    Satdhabudha, A.
    Poachanukoon, O.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 76 (04) : 583 - 588
  • [36] Association between desloratadine and prednisolone in the treatment of children with acute symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial
    Wandalsen, Gustavo F.
    Miranda, Carolina
    Ensina, Luis Felipe
    Sano, Flavio
    Amazonas, Roberto Bleul
    da Silva, Joyce Macedo
    Sole, Dirceu
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 83 (06) : 633 - 639
  • [37] Intranasal exposure to monoclonal antibody Fab fragments to Japanese cedar pollen Cry j1 suppresses Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis
    Yoshino, S.
    Mizutani, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 173 (10) : 1629 - 1638
  • [38] A Phase Iii Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Desloratadine In Japanese Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
    Hisada, S.
    Maeda, Y.
    Oshima, N.
    Tanaka, Y.
    Weinstein, C. I.
    Okubo, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [39] Double-blind study of cetirizine and loratadine versus placebo in patients with allergic rhinitis
    Nunes, C
    Ladeira, S
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 10 (01): : 20 - 23
  • [40] Identification of biomarker sets for predicting the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy against pollen-induced allergic rhinitis
    Gotoh, Minoru
    Kaminuma, Osamu
    Nakaya, Akihiro
    Katayama, Kazufumi
    Motoi, Yuji
    Watanabe, Nobumasa
    Saeki, Mayumi
    Nishimura, Tomoe
    Kitamura, Noriko
    Yamaoka, Kazuko
    Okubo, Kimihiro
    Hiroi, Takachika
    INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 29 (06) : 291 - 300