Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff Portable Noncontact Tonometers, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

被引:8
|
作者
Hubanova, Ralitsa [1 ,2 ]
Aptel, Florent [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Thierry [1 ,2 ]
Arnol, Nathalie [3 ]
Romanet, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
Chiquet, Christophe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
[2] CHU Grenoble, Dept Ophthalmol, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Grenoble 1, INSERM, U1042, Lab Hypoxia & Physiopathol, Grenoble, France
关键词
portable noncontact tonometer; intraocular pressure; screening; glaucoma; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/01.ijg.0000435776.99193.41
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using 2 portable tonometers, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff and the Reichert PT100, with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).Materials and Methods:Prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on normotensive and hypertensive patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of Grenoble. IOP was measured using 2 portable noncontact tonometers (NCTs) and GAT in one eye of each patient in a random order. Central corneal thickness was measured with the Accutome PachPen Pachymeter. The Wilcoxon and t tests were used to compare the differences between tonometers, the Pearson and the Spearman correlation tests to evaluate the correlation among the methods, and the Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the agreement among the methods. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the agreement among the methods in normotensive and hypertensive patients separately.Results:A total of 137 eyes of 137 patients were included, 104 normotensive and 33 hypertensive eyes. We found an excellent agreement between PT100 and GAT (ICC=0.77) and between Intellipuff and GAT (ICC=0.75) in normotensive patients. We found a fair to good agreement (ICC=0.67) between PT100 and GAT in hypertensive patients. The agreement we found between Intellipuff and GAT was also excellent in hypertensive patients (ICC=0.86). Both NCTs significantly overestimated IOP measurements compared with GAT in normotensive and hypertensive eyes (mean of the differences between PT100 and GAT: 1.32.1 and 8.1 +/- 4.6 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05), and between Pulsair Intellipuff and GAT: 1.5 +/- 1.8 and 2.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg in normotensive and in hypertensive patients, respectively (P<0.05).Conclusions:The 2 NCTs agree well with GAT in normotensive patients. The Pulsair Intellipuff also agrees well with GAT in hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 363
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Salim, Sarwat
    Linn, Daniel J.
    Echols, James R., II
    Netland, Peter A.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 3 : 341 - 344
  • [2] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Reichert 7 Noncontact Tonometry
    Gungor, Sirel G.
    Akman, Ahmet
    Yazici, Ayse C.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (06) : 438 - 441
  • [3] Two-position measurement of intraocular pressure by PT100 noncontact tonometry in comparison with Goldmann tonometry
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Chijuka, John C.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 5 : 1227 - 1234
  • [4] Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Parker, VA
    Herrtage, J
    Sarkies, NJC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (11) : 1303 - 1304
  • [5] A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Popovich, KS
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THE KEELER PULSAIR-2000 NONCONTACT TONOMETER WITH GOLDMANN APPLANATION
    MOSELEY, MJ
    THOMPSON, JR
    DEUTSCH, J
    MISSON, GP
    NAYLOR, G
    TANYEE, A
    TAYLOR, RH
    FIELDER, AR
    EYE, 1993, 7 : 127 - 130
  • [7] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Vodencarevic, Amra Nadarevic
    Jusufovic, Vahid
    Terzic, Svjetlana
    Halilbasic, Meliha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 163 : 192 - 192
  • [8] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children
    Feng, Chi Shian
    Jin, Ki Won
    Yi, Kayoung
    Choi, Dong Gyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 160 (05) : 937 - 943
  • [9] Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers
    Mackie, SW
    Jay, JL
    Ackerley, R
    Walsh, G
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1996, 16 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [10] Effects of posture changes on Intraocular Pressure measurements in Healthy Eyes - Goldman Applanation, Schoitz Indentation and PT100 Noncontact tonometers
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi
    Tairi, Ahmed
    Simmons, David
    King, Matthew
    Zafar, Hamayun
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)