Current relationship between coal consumption and the economic development and China's future carbon mitigation policies

被引:85
作者
Jia, Zhijie [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Shiyan [3 ]
Sun, Zao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Int Relations, Res Sch Southeast Asian Studies, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Coal consumption; Spatial durbin panel model; Computable general equilibrium (CGE) model; China; CO2 emission mitigation; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; GRAVITY MODEL; UNITED-STATES; GROWTH; TAX; EMISSION; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112812
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China is the largest emitter worldwide, and coal consumption contributes the most. So the key to emission mitigation is to reduce coal consumption. The paper applies panel data during 1998-2017 to analyze the relationship between coal consumption and economic development. The results indicate that the relationship is now weakening, and find evidence of inter-provincial relocation of the coal-intensive industries. The reduction of the marginal contribution provides the possibility for China's economic emission mitigation. Then, the paper applies a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium model to simulate carbon mitigation policies during 2017-2030 at the same emission reduction level, including coal capacity cut, Emission Trading Scheme (ETS), carbon tax with ETS, and resource tax. The results show that different policies have specific advantages: coal capacity cut reduces coal consumption the most; ETS significantly improves the share of renewable energy; carbon tax with ETS could optimize economic structure; resource tax is good at protecting the economic aggregate. Based on these conclusions, specific policy implications are proposed, such as measurements of increasing energy cost and collaborative regional environmental regulation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama ;
Saboori, Behnaz ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 76 :123-131
[2]   The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: Evidence from emerging market economies [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (06) :1972-1977
[3]   Coal consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Empirical evidence and policy responses [J].
Bloch, Harry ;
Rafiq, Shuddhasattwa ;
Salim, Ruhul .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (02) :518-528
[4]   Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax [J].
Bristow, Abigail L. ;
Wardman, Mark ;
Zanni, Alberto M. ;
Chintakayala, Phani K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) :1824-1837
[5]   China's emissions trading system and an ETS-carbon tax hybrid [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Jorgenson, Dale W. ;
Nielsen, Chris P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :741-753
[6]   How to win public support for a global carbon tax [J].
Carattini, Stefano ;
Kallbekken, Steffen ;
Orlov, Anton .
NATURE, 2019, 565 (7739) :289-291
[7]   Coal consumption in China: How to bend down the curve? [J].
Chai, Jian ;
Du, Mengfan ;
Liang, Ting ;
Sun, Xiaojie Christine ;
Yu, Ji ;
Zhang, Zhe George .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 80 :38-47
[8]   The energy price equivalence of carbon taxes and emissions trading-Theory and evidence [J].
Chiu, Fan-Ping ;
Kuo, Hsiao-I. ;
Chen, Chi-Chung ;
Hsu, Chia-Sheng .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 160 :164-171
[9]   Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade-off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction? [J].
Danish ;
Ulucak, Recep ;
Khan, Salah Ud-Din ;
Baloch, Muhammad Awais ;
Li, Nan .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 28 (04) :813-822
[10]   A Gravity Model to Explain Flows of Wild Edible Mushroom Picking. A Panel Data Analysis [J].
de Frutos, Pablo ;
Rodriguez-Prado, Beatriz ;
Latorre, Joaquin ;
Martinez-Pena, Fernando .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 156 :164-173