Automated drivability: Toward an assessment of the spatial deployment of level 4 automated vehicles

被引:30
|
作者
Soteropoulos, Aggelos [1 ]
Mitteregger, Mathias [2 ]
Berger, Martin [3 ]
Zwirchmayr, Jakob [4 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Transportat Syst Planning, Futurelab, Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Spatial Planning, Futurelab, Vienna, Austria
[3] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Transportat Syst Planning, Vienna, Austria
[4] TTTech Auto, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Automated vehicles; Autonomous vehicles; Operational design domain; Automated drivability; Framework; Index; WALKABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Two scenarios have shaped the discussion on the deployment of automated vehicles (AVs). The first is the revolutionary or disruptive scenario, in which a competitor would reach fully automated vehicles (level 5) in one giant leap. The second scenario renders the deployment of AVs as a lengthy process of evolutionary vehicle automation, progressing from specialized, controlled and restricted conditions, i.e. operational design domains (ODDs), to ever more complex ones. But as it becomes more and more clear that there are large uncertainties about how far in the future level 5 AVs become available, in the near future situations in which the driver is replaced completely, i.e. not requiring driver interventions, only seem feasible in specific ODDs and cities will likely be faced by highly automated vehicles (level 4) equipped with automated driving systems (ADSs) for specific ODDs over a longer period. However, cities comprise different street spaces with various conditions which lead to different requirements for the ADSs and could affect the deployment of level 4 AVs and thus the impacts of AVs in cities in the near future. This paper presents a framework and related indicators for assessing the automated drivability, i.e. the suitability of street spaces for the functioning operation of ADSs from a technical-infrastructural point of view, based on the relationship between the current technological development state of ADSs and different (urban) street spaces. Using the case study of the city of Vienna in Austria to apply the framework, a set of indicators for the different components of the framework is calculated and integrated to build an automated drivability index (ADX), illustrating the automated drivability within the street network. The results are a first step to indicate which areas are more suitable for level 4 AVs from a technological point of view, as well as areas where a deployment of AVs would only be possible after larger adjustments of the infrastructure or at considerably lower than intended speeds; thus, detailing the complexity of driving urban street spaces in a yet unprecedented level. Besides other aspects this can give hints for policy makers and other stakeholders where to facilitate the deployment of AVs.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 84
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pedestrian assessment: Is displaying automated driving mode in self-driving vehicles as relevant as emitting an engine sound in electric vehicles?
    Faas, Stefanie M.
    Baumann, Martin
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2021, 94 (94)
  • [42] ?You?re a Cop and You Gotta Help Me!?: How the type of automated vehicles and collision algorithms influence individuals? attitudes toward the vehicles
    Joo, Yeon Kyoung
    Jeong, Min-Wook
    Kim, Banya
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 93 : 266 - 279
  • [43] Non-deterministic model validation methodology for simulation-based safety assessment of automated vehicles?
    Riedmaier, Stefan
    Schneider, Jakob
    Danquah, Benedikt
    Schick, Bernhard
    Diermeyer, Frank
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2021, 109
  • [44] An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?
    Ackermann, Claudia
    Beggiato, Matthias
    Schubert, Sarah
    Krems, Josef F.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 75 : 272 - 282
  • [45] Scenario Parameter Generation Method and Scenario Representativeness Metric for Scenario-Based Assessment of Automated Vehicles
    de Gelder, Erwin
    Hof, Jasper
    Cator, Eric
    Paardekooper, Jan-Pieter
    Op den Camp, Olaf
    Ploeg, Jeroen
    de Schutter, Bart
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (10) : 18794 - 18807
  • [46] Assessing Energy Impacts of Connected and Automated Vehicles at the US National Level-Preliminary Bounds and Proposed Methods
    Stephens, Thomas S.
    Auld, Josh
    Chen, Yuche
    Gonder, Jeffrey
    Kontou, Eleftheria
    Lin, Zhenhong
    Xie, Fei
    Mohammadian, Abolfazl
    Shabanpour, Ramin
    Gohlke, David
    ROAD VEHICLE AUTOMATION 5, 2019, : 105 - 115
  • [47] Inferring Takeover in SAE Level 2 Automated Vehicles Using Driver-Based Behavioral and Psychophysiological Signals
    Konishi, Matthew
    Hunter, Jacob G.
    Zheng, Zhaobo K.
    Misu, Teruhisa
    Akash, Kumar
    Reid, Tahira
    Jain, Neera
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (41): : 7 - 12
  • [48] Scenario-Mining for Level 4 Automated Vehicle Safety Assessment from Real Accident Situations in Urban Areas Using a Natural Language Process
    Park, Sangmin
    Park, Sungho
    Jeong, Harim
    Yun, Ilsoo
    So, Jaehyun
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (20)
  • [49] Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach
    Zhu, Jieyu
    Ma, Yanli
    Lou, Yining
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 166
  • [50] When and where should there be dedicated lanes under mixed traffic of automated and human-driven vehicles for system-level benefits?
    Kumar, Amit
    Guhathakurta, Subhrajit
    Venkatachalam, Sneha
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 36