Validation and Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Measured by Doppler Echocardiography

被引:73
|
作者
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Bagur, Rodrigo [1 ]
Bergeron, Sebastien [1 ]
De Larochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Doyle, Daniel [1 ]
Larose, Eric [1 ]
Dumesnil, Jean G. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; echocardiography; prosthesis; transcatheter; valves; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LOW-FLOW; STENOSIS; IMPLANTATION; REPLACEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves. BACKGROUND Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown. METHODS A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA(1)), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA(2)), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent. RESULTS The average EOA(2) (1.57 +/- 0.41 cm(2)) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA(1) (1.21 +/- 0.38 cm(2)). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA(2) than with EOA(1) (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA(2) (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA(1) (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA(2) compared to EOA(1) (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA(2). The average EOA varied from 1.37 +/- 0.23 cm(2) for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 +/- 0.17 cm(2) for size >23 mm. CONCLUSIONS When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:1053-62) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1062
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated estimation of regurgitant volume and effective orifice area from color Doppler echocardiography
    Greenberg, NL
    Prior, DL
    Firstenberg, MS
    Garcia, MJ
    Thomas, JD
    COMPUTERS IN CARDIOLOGY 1999, VOL 26, 1999, 26 : 619 - 622
  • [42] METHODS AND DETERMINANTS OF DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASURES OF PROSTHETIC VALVE EFFECTIVE AREA FOLLOWING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC IMPLANTATION
    Clavel, M.
    Rodes-Cabau, J.
    Bergeron, S.
    Dumont, E.
    Bagur, R.
    De Larocheliere, R.
    Doyle, D.
    Lemieux, J.
    Dumesnil, J. G.
    Pibarot, P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (05) : S230 - S230
  • [43] Determinants of effective orifice area in aortic valve replacement: anatomic and clinical factors
    Kim, Hee Jung
    Park, Sung Jun
    Koo, Hyun Jung
    Kang, Joon-Won
    Yang, Dong Hyun
    Jung, Sung Ho
    Choo, Suk Jung
    Chung, Cheol Hyun
    Lee, Joon Woo
    Kim, Joon Bum
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (05) : 1942 - +
  • [44] Effective orifice area by the continuity equation in four valve designs in the aortic position
    Grainger, N
    Cooke, R
    Chambers, J
    HEART, 1996, 75 (06) : 45 - 45
  • [45] EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA OF A NEWLY DEVELOPED POLYURETHANE AORTIC VALVE: MANUFACTURING AND EVALUATION
    Shih, Wu-Chiao
    Vu, Ha-Hai
    Hsu, Cheung-Hwa
    Yang, Kai-Wen
    Kang, Yaw-Hong
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2014, 22 (06): : 694 - 699
  • [46] Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Catalano, Michael A.
    Rutkin, Bruce
    Koss, Elana
    Maurer, Greg
    Berg, Jacinda
    Hartman, Alan
    Yu, Pey-Jen
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (01) : 191 - 196
  • [47] The ratio of measured and reference effective orifice areas for discriminating prosthetic aortic valve obstruction
    Kim, Kyu
    Kim, Dae-Young
    Seo, Jiwon
    Cho, Iksung
    Shim, Chi Young
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    Ha, Jong-Won
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 24 (02) : 232 - 240
  • [48] Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size
    Eriksson, MJ
    Rosfors, S
    Rådegran, K
    Brodin, LÅ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (04): : 619 - 622
  • [49] VALIDATION AND APPLICATIONS OF INDEXED AORTIC PROSTHETIC VALVE AREAS CALCULATED BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    DUMESNIL, JG
    HONOS, GN
    LEMIEUX, M
    BEAUCHEMIN, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (03) : 637 - 643
  • [50] TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Lerakis, S.
    Block, P.
    Thourani, V.
    Guyton, R.
    Babaliaros, V.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 125 : 238 - 238