Validation and Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Measured by Doppler Echocardiography

被引:73
|
作者
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Bagur, Rodrigo [1 ]
Bergeron, Sebastien [1 ]
De Larochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Doyle, Daniel [1 ]
Larose, Eric [1 ]
Dumesnil, Jean G. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; echocardiography; prosthesis; transcatheter; valves; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LOW-FLOW; STENOSIS; IMPLANTATION; REPLACEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves. BACKGROUND Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown. METHODS A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA(1)), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA(2)), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent. RESULTS The average EOA(2) (1.57 +/- 0.41 cm(2)) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA(1) (1.21 +/- 0.38 cm(2)). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA(2) than with EOA(1) (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA(2) (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA(1) (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA(2) compared to EOA(1) (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA(2). The average EOA varied from 1.37 +/- 0.23 cm(2) for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 +/- 0.17 cm(2) for size >23 mm. CONCLUSIONS When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:1053-62) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1062
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Aytekin, Saide
    Yurdakul, Selen
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 44 (03): : 260 - 271
  • [32] Doppler haemodynamics and effective orifice areas of Edwards SAPIEN and CoreValve transcatheter aortic valves
    Spethmann, Sebastian
    Dreger, Henryk
    Schattke, Sebastian
    Baldenhofer, Gerd
    Saghabalyan, Davit
    Stangl, Verena
    Laule, Michael
    Baumann, Gert
    Stangl, Karl
    Knebel, Fabian
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 13 (08) : 690 - 696
  • [33] EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA REFERENCE VALUES WITH THE DIFFERENT SIZES OF THE SAPIEN 3 BALLOON-EXPANDING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
    Oberweis, Brandon S.
    Hamid, Nadira
    Khalique, Omar
    George, Isaac
    Nazif, Tamim
    Vahl, Torsten
    White, Jonathon
    Kodali, Susheel
    Leon, Martin
    Hahn, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 401 - 401
  • [34] Impact of valve size, predicted effective and indexed effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement
    Luthra, Suvitesh
    Malvindi, Pietro G.
    Olevano, Carlo
    Zingale, Anna
    Salem, Hamdi
    Ohri, Sunil K.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (03) : 961 - 968
  • [35] NONINVASIVE DETERMINATION OF PROSTHETIC AORTIC-VALVE AREA BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    DENNIG, K
    RUDOLPH, W
    HERZ, 1986, 11 (06) : 341 - 345
  • [36] DETERMINATION OF AORTIC-VALVE ORIFICE AREA IN AORTIC-VALVE STENOSIS BY TWO-DIMENSIONAL TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    HOFMANN, T
    KASPER, W
    MEINERTZ, T
    SPILLNER, G
    SCHLOSSER, V
    JUST, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 59 (04): : 330 - 335
  • [37] NONINVASIVE QUANTIFICATION OF THE AORTIC-VALVE AREA IN AORTIC-STENOSIS BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    ZHANG, Y
    MYHRE, E
    NITTERHAUGE, S
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1985, 6 (12) : 992 - 998
  • [38] NONINVASIVE QUANTIFICATION OF AORTIC-VALVE AREA IN AORTIC-STENOSIS BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    ZHANG, Y
    NITTERHAUGE, S
    MYHRE, E
    CIRCULATION, 1985, 72 (04) : 144 - 144
  • [39] Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis
    Choe, Jooae
    Koo, Hyun Jung
    Choi, Se Jin
    Lee, Seung-Ah
    Kim, Dae-Hee
    Song, Jong-Min
    Kang, Duk-Hyun
    Song, Jae-Kwan
    Kang, Joon-Won
    Yang, Dong Hyun
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [40] Flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived aortic valve effective orifice area are real and not due to artifact
    Kadem, L
    Rieu, R
    Dumesnil, JG
    Durand, LG
    Pibarot, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (01) : 131 - 137