Validation and Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Measured by Doppler Echocardiography

被引:73
|
作者
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Bagur, Rodrigo [1 ]
Bergeron, Sebastien [1 ]
De Larochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Doyle, Daniel [1 ]
Larose, Eric [1 ]
Dumesnil, Jean G. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; echocardiography; prosthesis; transcatheter; valves; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LOW-FLOW; STENOSIS; IMPLANTATION; REPLACEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves. BACKGROUND Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown. METHODS A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA(1)), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA(2)), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent. RESULTS The average EOA(2) (1.57 +/- 0.41 cm(2)) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA(1) (1.21 +/- 0.38 cm(2)). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA(2) than with EOA(1) (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA(2) (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA(1) (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA(2) compared to EOA(1) (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA(2). The average EOA varied from 1.37 +/- 0.23 cm(2) for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 +/- 0.17 cm(2) for size >23 mm. CONCLUSIONS When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:1053-62) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1062
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis
    Garcia, Julio
    Kadem, Lyes
    Larose, Eric
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Pibarot, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2011, 13
  • [22] Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis
    Julio Garcia
    Lyes Kadem
    Eric Larose
    Marie-Annick Clavel
    Philippe Pibarot
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13
  • [23] CALCULATION OF AORTIC REGURGITATION ORIFICE AREA BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY - AN APPLICATION OF THE CONTINUITY EQUATION
    YEUNG, AC
    PLAPPERT, T
    SUTTON, MGS
    BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 68 (02): : 236 - 240
  • [24] Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area
    Ternacle, Julien
    Guimaraes, Leonardo
    Vincent, Flavien
    Cote, Nancy
    Cote, Melanie
    Lachance, Dominique
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Abbas, Amr E.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 22 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [25] What do you mean by aortic valve area: Geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or Gorlin area?
    Garcia, Damien
    Kadem, Lyes
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2006, 15 (05): : 601 - 608
  • [26] Bioprosthetic mitral valve effective orifice area by phase-contrast CMR. An in vitro comparison with Doppler echocardiography
    Dimitrios Maragiannis
    Matthew Jackson
    Karen Chin
    Kyle Autry
    Stephen Igo
    Dipan J Shah
    Stephen H Little
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [27] Effective orifice area and transvalvular gradient after aortic valve replacement
    Lau, G.
    Puar, U.
    Greberska, W.
    Ng, A.
    Swanevelder, J.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (05) : 557 - 557
  • [28] Echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Mangner, N.
    Schuler, G.
    Linke, A.
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2013, 61 (04): : 393 - 405
  • [29] Echocardiography for transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Chin, Derek
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 10 (01): : I21 - I29
  • [30] Echocardiography in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Vollema, E. Mara
    Delgado, Victoria
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (09): : 1384 - 1399