The use of Permacol® biological mesh for complex abdominal wall repair

被引:3
|
作者
Dirani, Mazen [1 ]
Chahine, Elias [1 ]
D'Alessandro, Antonio [1 ]
Chouillard, Marc-Anthony [1 ]
Gumbs, Andrew A. [1 ]
Chouillard, Elie [1 ]
机构
[1] Poissy St Germain Med Ctr, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, 10 Rue Champ Gaillard, F-78300 Poissy, France
来源
MINERVA SURGERY | 2022年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Hernia; ventral; Surgical mesh; Infections; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; COLLAGEN; SUTURE; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.21.08779-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) remains challenging, especially in contaminated fields where the use of a synthetic mesh is associated with prohibitively complication rates. Consequently, biological mesh has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using Permacol (R) in patients who had CAWR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients who had CAWR using the Permacol (R) mesh. Analysis included patients' preoperative characteristics, procedural parameters, and early and late post-operative complications in- cluding mainly recurrence. A multivariate regression model was performed to determine factors that influence 24-months recurrence rate. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2018, 75 patients. The most common indication was hernia in a con- taminated field (48.0%) and abdominal wall defect greater than 10 cm in diameter (36%). Overall, 44% of our patients were Centers for Disease Control (CDC) class II or III and 81.3% fall into category II or III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification. Recurrence rate of our series was 9.3%. Complete fascial closure was achieved in 60 patients (80%). Upon univariate analysis complete fascial closure, posterior component separation, se- roma drainage, BMI>30 kg/m2 and age >65 years, VHWD grade >2, DINDO CLAVIEN class >2 affected the recurrence rate at 2 years follow-up. When subcutaneous drains are placed prophylactically, recurrence rates drop from 38.7% (5/14) to 3.3% (2/61 patients) when drains are placed at the time of operation (P=0.02). Only fascial closure affected the 24-months recurrence rate on multivariate analysis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Permacol (R) surgical implant use for CAWR is safe with a relatively low rate of hernia recurrence at 2 years. Prophylactic subcutaneous drain placement may reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. The presence of contami- nated fields does not appear to influence hernia recurrence when Permacol (R) is used, in fact, the only factor that affects recurrence rate at 24-months on multivariate analysis is completeness of the fascial closure.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Complex abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh in elderly: a propensity matched analysis
    S. Gogna
    R. Latifi
    A. Policastro
    K. Prabhakaran
    P. Anderson
    J. Con
    J. Choi
    D. J. Samson
    J. Butler
    Hernia, 2020, 24 : 495 - 502
  • [42] Synthetic versus Biologic Mesh in Single-Stage Repair of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects in a Contaminated Field
    Chamieh, Jad
    Tan, Wen Hui
    Ramirez, Ricardo
    Nohra, Eden
    Apakama, Chukwuma
    Symons, William
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2017, 18 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [43] Collagen/Polypropylene Composite Mesh Biocompatibility in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Lukasiewicz, Aleksander
    Skopinska-Wisniewska, Joanna
    Marszalek, Andrzej
    Molski, Stanislaw
    Drewa, Tomasz
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (05) : 731E - 740E
  • [44] Primary Fascial Closure with Mesh Reinforcement Is Superior to Bridged Mesh Repair for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Booth, Justin H.
    Garvey, Patrick B.
    Baumann, Donald P.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    Nguyen, Alexander T.
    Clemens, Mark W.
    Liu, Jun
    Butler, Charles E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (06) : 999 - 1009
  • [45] A review of available prosthetic material for abdominal wall repair
    Poussier, M.
    Deneve, E.
    Blanc, P.
    Boulay, E.
    Bertrand, M.
    Nedelcu, M.
    Herrero, A.
    Fabre, J-M.
    Nocca, D.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2013, 150 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [46] Use of biological mesh in facilitation of early closure in potentially infected abdominal wall defects
    Hoyrup, Stine
    Bruun, Jens
    Bertelsen, Claus Anders
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 59 (03):
  • [47] The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study
    Giordano, P.
    Pullan, R. D.
    Ystgaard, B.
    Gossetti, F.
    Bradburn, M.
    McKinley, A. J.
    Smart, N. J.
    Daniels, I. R.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 19 (07) : 411 - 417
  • [48] Combined use of composite mesh and acellular dermal matrix graft for abdominal wall repair following tumour resection
    Fernandez, Juan Angel
    Alconchel, Felipe
    Frutos, Maria Dolores
    Gil, Elena
    Gomez-Valles, Paula
    Gomez, Beatriz
    Fernandez-Pascual, Clemente
    Munoz-Romero, Fulgencio
    Puertas, Pablo
    Valcarcel, Antonio
    Garcia, Jeronimo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [49] Reinforcement of the Abdominal Wall following Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Flaps: A Comparison of Synthetic and Biological Mesh
    Patel, Ketan M.
    Shuck, John
    Hung, Rex
    Hannan, Lindsay
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (03) : 700 - 707
  • [50] A "Buttressed Mesh" Technique for Fascial Closure in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
    Davison, Steven P.
    Parikh, Pranay M.
    Jacobson, Jeffrey M.
    Iorio, Matthew L.
    Kalan, Mohammed
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (03) : 284 - 289