The use of Permacol® biological mesh for complex abdominal wall repair

被引:3
|
作者
Dirani, Mazen [1 ]
Chahine, Elias [1 ]
D'Alessandro, Antonio [1 ]
Chouillard, Marc-Anthony [1 ]
Gumbs, Andrew A. [1 ]
Chouillard, Elie [1 ]
机构
[1] Poissy St Germain Med Ctr, Dept Gen & Digest Surg, 10 Rue Champ Gaillard, F-78300 Poissy, France
来源
MINERVA SURGERY | 2022年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Hernia; ventral; Surgical mesh; Infections; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; COLLAGEN; SUTURE; IMPLANTS;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-5691.21.08779-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Complex abdominal wall repair (CAWR) remains challenging, especially in contaminated fields where the use of a synthetic mesh is associated with prohibitively complication rates. Consequently, biological mesh has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using Permacol (R) in patients who had CAWR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients who had CAWR using the Permacol (R) mesh. Analysis included patients' preoperative characteristics, procedural parameters, and early and late post-operative complications in- cluding mainly recurrence. A multivariate regression model was performed to determine factors that influence 24-months recurrence rate. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2018, 75 patients. The most common indication was hernia in a con- taminated field (48.0%) and abdominal wall defect greater than 10 cm in diameter (36%). Overall, 44% of our patients were Centers for Disease Control (CDC) class II or III and 81.3% fall into category II or III according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) classification. Recurrence rate of our series was 9.3%. Complete fascial closure was achieved in 60 patients (80%). Upon univariate analysis complete fascial closure, posterior component separation, se- roma drainage, BMI>30 kg/m2 and age >65 years, VHWD grade >2, DINDO CLAVIEN class >2 affected the recurrence rate at 2 years follow-up. When subcutaneous drains are placed prophylactically, recurrence rates drop from 38.7% (5/14) to 3.3% (2/61 patients) when drains are placed at the time of operation (P=0.02). Only fascial closure affected the 24-months recurrence rate on multivariate analysis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Permacol (R) surgical implant use for CAWR is safe with a relatively low rate of hernia recurrence at 2 years. Prophylactic subcutaneous drain placement may reduce the risk of hernia recurrence. The presence of contami- nated fields does not appear to influence hernia recurrence when Permacol (R) is used, in fact, the only factor that affects recurrence rate at 24-months on multivariate analysis is completeness of the fascial closure.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure
    Kamarajah, S. K.
    Chapman, S. J.
    Glasbey, J.
    Morton, D.
    Smart, N.
    Pinkney, T.
    Bhangu, A.
    BJS OPEN, 2018, 2 (06): : 371 - 380
  • [22] Feasibility of mesh repair for strangulated abdominal wall hernias
    Abd Ellatif, Mohamed E.
    Negm, Ahmed
    Elmorsy, Gamal
    Al-Katary, Mohammed
    Yousef, Abd El-Azeim M.
    Ellaithy, Ramadan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 10 (03) : 153 - 156
  • [23] Zinc-Impregnated Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair Reduces Infection in a Rat Model of Peritonitis
    Yurtkap, Yagmur
    Jairam, An P.
    Kaufmann, Ruth
    Kroese, Leonard F.
    Clahsen-van Groningen, Marian C.
    Mouton, Johan W.
    Menon, Anand G.
    Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
    Jeekel, Johannes
    Lange, Johan F.
    Belt, Eric J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 246 : 560 - 567
  • [24] Repair of High-Risk Incisional Hernias and Traumatic Abdominal Wall Defects with Porcine Mesh
    Byrnes, Matthew C.
    Irwin, Eric
    Carlson, Dana
    Campeau, Amy
    Gipson, Jonathon C.
    Beal, Alan
    Croston, J. Kevin
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2011, 77 (02) : 144 - 150
  • [25] The choice of the mesh composition to use in the intraperitoneal position in the surgical repair of abdominal wall defects
    Mendes e Ferreira de Araujo, Ubirajara Rutilio
    Czeczko, Nicolau Gregori
    Deallarmi, Andressa
    Hemoviski, Flavia Emilie
    Pereira Araujo, Helena V. C.
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 23 (02): : 118 - 121
  • [26] The use of biological mesh to repair one large, contaminated abdominal wall defect due to neoplastic invasion. Report of a case
    Galli, Davide
    Goi, Gloria
    Pariani, Dario
    Moroni, Eliana
    Danelli, Piergiorgio
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2012, 83 (02) : 167 - 169
  • [27] Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction
    Iacco, Anthony
    Adeyemo, Adewunmi
    Riggs, Thomas
    Janczyk, Randy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 208 (03) : 480 - 483
  • [28] Evidence for Replacement of an Infected Synthetic by a Biological Mesh in Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
    Montgomery, Agneta
    Kallinowski, Friedrich
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2016, 2
  • [29] Fibroplasia after polypropylene mesh implantation for abdominal wall hernia repair in rats
    Vazi, Marcia
    Krebs, Rodrigo Ketzer
    Trindade, Eduardo Neubarth
    Maciel Trindade, Manoel Roberto
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2009, 24 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [30] Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair
    Claire L Nockolds
    Jason P Hodde
    Paul S Rooney
    BMC Surgery, 14