The influence of the fitness evaluation method on the performance of multiobjective search algorithms

被引:28
作者
Burke, EK [1 ]
Silva, JDL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Automated Scheduling Optimisat & Planning Res Grp, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Nottingham NC8 1BB, England
关键词
multiobjective metaheuristics; fitness evaluation; space allocation; dominance relation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.028
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we are concerned with finding the Pareto optimal front or a good approximation to it. Since non-dominated solutions represent the goal in multiobjective optimisation, the dominance relation is frequently used to establish preference between solutions during the search. Recently, relaxed forms of the dominance relation have been proposed in the literature for improving the performance of multiobjective search methods. This paper investigates the influence of different fitness evaluation methods on the performance of two multiobjective methodologies when applied to a highly constrained two-objective optimisation problem. The two algorithms are: the Pareto archive evolutionary strategy and a population-based annealing algorithm. We demonstrate here, on a highly constrained problem, that the method used to evaluate the fitness of candidate solutions during the search affects the performance of both algorithms and it appears that the dominance relation is not always the best method to use. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 897
页数:23
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Aarts E., 1998, SIMULATED ANNEALING
[2]  
AERST JCJ, 2002, INT J GEOGR INF SYST, V16, P571
[3]  
Ang KH, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P1139, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004403
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SOLVE IT MODERN HEUR
[5]  
[Anonymous], J MULTICRITERIA DECI, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199907)8:4{
[6]  
Bagchi TP, 2001, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1993, P458
[7]  
Basseur M, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P1151, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004405
[8]   A taboo search based approach to find the Pareto optimal set in multiple objective optimization [J].
Baykasoglu, A ;
Owen, S ;
Gindy, N .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1999, 31 (06) :731-748
[9]  
Belton V., 2002, INTEGRATED APPROACH, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4_9]
[10]   Space-planning by ant colony optimisation [J].
Bland, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 12 (06) :320-328