Comparison of effect of vitamin E-coated dialyzer and oral vitamin E on hemodialysis-induced Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase

被引:17
|
作者
Akiyama, S
Inagaki, M
Tsuji, M
Gotoh, H
Gotoh, T
Washio, K
Gotoh, Y
Oguchi, K
机构
[1] Showa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Shinagawa Ku, Tokyo 1428555, Japan
[2] Saiyu Soka Hosp, Saitama, Japan
关键词
vitamin E; vitamin E-coated dialyzer; Cu/Zn-SOD; Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA; oxidative stress and hemodialysis;
D O I
10.1159/000088172
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: We reported earlier that production of Cu/ Zn- superoxide dismutase ( SOD) increases markedly in hemodialysis patients but not in non- dialyzed chronic renal failure ( CRF) patients. In this study, we compared the antioxidant effects of oral vitamin E supplementation ( VE- PO) and vitamin E coating of a dialyzer ( VE- BMD) by measuring increased Cu/ Zn- SOD in hemodialysis patients. Methods: 31 hemodialysis patients were divided into two groups: 16 hemodialysis patients underwent usual dialysis with vitamin E supplementation 600 mg/ day while 15 others were dialyzed using vitamin E- coated membrane for 6 months. Total plasma SOD activity was determined by NBT method, plasma Cu/ Zn- SOD contents by ELISA and Cu/ Zn- SOD mRNA in leukocytes by RT- PCR. Results: VE- PO and VE- BMD showed almost comparable effects on Cu/ Zn- SOD contents and its mRNA levels in hemodialysis patients. VE- PO resulted in a progressive decrease of Cu/ Zn- SOD content ( p < 0.001). A comparable progressive decrease was observed also in VE- BMD ( p < 0.0001). Both VE- PO and VE-BMD resulted in a progressive decrease of Cu/ Zn- SOD mRNA ( p < 0.01), which reached the level of non- dialyzed CRF patients. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Effect of propofol on in vitro lipid peroxidation induced by different free radical generating systems: A comparison with vitamin E
    Hans, P
    Deby, C
    DebyDupont, G
    Vrijens, B
    Albert, A
    Lamy, M
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 8 (02) : 154 - 158