Conclusive quantum steering with superconducting transition-edge sensors

被引:208
作者
Smith, Devin H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gillett, Geoff [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Almeida, Marcelo P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Branciard, Cyril [3 ]
Fedrizzi, Alessandro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Weinhold, Till J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lita, Adriana [4 ]
Calkins, Brice [4 ]
Gerrits, Thomas [4 ]
Wiseman, Howard M. [5 ]
Nam, Sae Woo [4 ]
White, Andrew G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Engn Quantum Syst, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Quantum Computat & Commun Technol, Australian Res Council, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Math & Phys, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[5] Griffith Univ, Ctr Quantum Computat & Commun Technol, Australian Res Council, Ctr Quantum Dynam, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2012年 / 3卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CURRENT SITUATION; BELLS-INEQUALITY; VIOLATION; ENTANGLEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/ncomms1628
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Quantum steering allows two parties to verify shared entanglement even if one measurement device is untrusted. A conclusive demonstration of steering through the violation of a steering inequality is of considerable fundamental interest and opens up applications in quantum communication. To date, all experimental tests with single-photon states have relied on post selection, allowing untrusted devices to cheat by hiding unfavourable events in losses. Here we close this 'detection loophole' by combining a highly efficient source of entangled photon pairs with superconducting transition-edge sensors. We achieve an unprecedented similar to 62% conditional detection efficiency of entangled photons and violate a steering inequality with the minimal number of measurement settings by 48 s.d.s. Our results provide a clear path to practical applications of steering and to a photonic loophole-free Bell test.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits [J].
Ansmann, Markus ;
Wang, H. ;
Bialczak, Radoslaw C. ;
Hofheinz, Max ;
Lucero, Erik ;
Neeley, M. ;
O'Connell, A. D. ;
Sank, D. ;
Weides, M. ;
Wenner, J. ;
Cleland, A. N. ;
Martinis, John M. .
NATURE, 2009, 461 (7263) :504-506
[2]  
Bell J. S., 1964, Physics, V1, P195, DOI [10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195, DOI 10.1103/PHYSICSPHYSIQUEFIZIKA.1.195, 10.1103/Physics-PhysiqueFizika.1.195]
[3]  
Bell J.S., 1993, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy
[4]  
Bennet A. J., 2011, ARBITRARILY LOSS TOL
[5]   Optimal collinear Gaussian beams for spontaneous parametric down-conversion [J].
Bennink, Ryan S. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 81 (05)
[6]   Experimental investigation of criteria for continuous variable entanglement [J].
Bowen, WP ;
Schnabel, R ;
Lam, PK ;
Ralph, TC .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 90 (04)
[7]  
Branciard C., 2011, ONE SIDED DEVICE IND
[8]   Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox [J].
Cavalcanti, E. G. ;
Jones, S. J. ;
Wiseman, H. M. ;
Reid, M. D. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 80 (03)
[9]   Spin entanglement, decoherence and Bohm's EPR paradox [J].
Cavalcanti, E. G. ;
Drummond, P. D. ;
Bachor, H. A. ;
Reid, M. D. .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2009, 17 (21) :18693-18702
[10]   EXPERIMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF OBJECTIVE LOCAL THEORIES [J].
CLAUSER, JF ;
HORNE, MA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1974, 10 (02) :526-535