Characteristics and impacts of peer assisted learning in university studies in health science: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Hernandez Colinir, J. [1 ]
Molina Gallardo, L. [1 ]
Gonzalez Morales, D. [2 ,3 ]
Ibanez Sanhueza, C. [3 ]
Jerez Yanez, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] CESFAM Violeta Parra, Chillan, Region De Nuble, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Fac Med, Programa Ayudantes Docentes, Independencia, Region Metropol, Chile
[3] Univ Chile, Fac Med, Dept Educ Ciencias Salud, Independencia, Region Metropol, Chile
来源
REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA | 2022年 / 222卷 / 01期
关键词
Peer assisted learning; Peer teaching; Near-peer teaching; Students; Health science; PRISMA; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; ANATOMY COURSE; LARGE-SCALE; PROGRAM; PERCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCE; EDUCATION; TUTOR; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rce.2021.02.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Systematically analyse the characteristics and impact of peer assisted learning programmes implemented in undergraduate health education. Methods: Following the PRISMA protocol, we searched the electronic indexed databases WoS and SCOPUS; original studies reporting peer assisted learning in health science careers were included in the systematic review. Among them, the studies between 2010 and January 2020 were selected, and information regarding programme structures and principal results was subsequently extracted. Results: A total of 47 studies were included in the review. The most frequent programme characteristics were the near-peer teaching modality, lecture classes, clinical laboratories and peer tutor training. The main findings identified were benefits in tutors' confidence and knowledge, better student comprehension and a more comfortable learning environment in comparison with that established by academic tutors. Conclusion: Peer assisted learning programmes have shown qualitative benefits in the learning environment, generation of support networks and confidence in knowledge acquired. Nonetheless, quantitative benefits measured as improvements in marks are inconclusive. Future studies are needed to standardise the methodologies used to determine which characteristics are the most positive in the learning process. (c) 2021 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 53
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hui
    Liao, Ariel Wen Xin
    Goh, Sam Hongli
    Wu, Xi Vivien
    Yoong, Si Qi
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2022, 118
  • [42] Consumer involvement in university education programs in the nursing, midwifery, and allied health professions: a systematic scoping review
    Soon, Yong En
    Murray, Carolyn M.
    Aguilar, Alejandra
    Boshoff, Kobie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 109
  • [43] Aboriginal youth summer camp in science and health science: a Western Canadian university review of 10 years of successes and learning
    Cheeptham, Naowarat
    Mahara, Star
    Antoine, Misty
    Insuk, Chadabhorn
    Loy, Kara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION PART B-COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, 2020, 10 (03): : 204 - 216
  • [44] Evaluating a Peer Assisted Learning Programme for Mature Access Foundation Students Undertaking Computer Programming at an Irish University
    Bermingham, Nevan
    Boylan, Frances
    Ryan, Barry J.
    JOURNAL OF PEER LEARNING, 2022, 14 : 52 - 70
  • [45] A Systematic Review of Digital Games in Second Language Learning Studies
    Poole, Frederick
    Clarke-Midura, Jody
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME-BASED LEARNING, 2020, 10 (03) : 1 - 15
  • [46] Is neuroimaging ready for the classroom? A systematic review of hyperscanning studies in learning
    Tan, S. H. Jessica
    Wong, Jin Nen
    Teo, Wei-Peng
    NEUROIMAGE, 2023, 281
  • [47] Developing a procedure for learning and assessing peer review in a forensic science programme
    Hamnett, Hilary J.
    McKie, Amanda E.
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) : 787 - 798
  • [48] References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature
    Bould, M. Dylan
    Hladkowicz, Emily S.
    Pigford, Ashlee-Ann E.
    Ufholz, Lee-Anne
    Postonogova, Tatyana
    Shin, Eunkyung
    Boet, Sylvain
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [49] Mental Health-Related Digital Use by University Students: A Systematic Review
    Montagni, Ilaria
    Tzourio, Christophe
    Cousin, Thierry
    Sagara, Joseph Amadomon
    Bada-Alonzi, Jennifer
    Horgan, Aine
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2020, 26 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [50] Cognitive and social congruence in peer-assisted learning - A scoping review
    Loda, Teresa
    Erschens, Rebecca
    Loenneker, Hannah
    Keifenheim, Katharina E.
    Nikendei, Christoph
    Junne, Florian
    Zipfel, Stephan
    Herrmann-Werner, Anne
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):