Remediation of acidic waste waters using immobilised, acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria

被引:116
作者
Kolmert, Å [1 ]
Johnson, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll N Wales, Sch Biol Sci, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
sulfate-reducing bacteria; acidic water; bioremediation;
D O I
10.1002/jctb.453
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Acidic wastewaters from industrial and mining activities constitute a wordwide environmental hazard. 'Acid mine drainage' (AMD) waters are often highly acidic (pH<4), contain elevated concentrations of sulfate and dissolved metals, and are toxic to most life forms. Whilst bioremediation of acidic, metal-contaminated waters using sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) has been successfully demonstrated in pilot-scale and full-scale operations during the past decade, the sensitivity of characterised SRB to acidity limits their use in AMD remediation. In the current study, we have evaluated the potential use of novel acidophilic SRB for remediating acidic waste waters, in comparision with, and in conjuction with, neutrophilic SRB. Three SRB-populations (a mixed population of acidophilic isolates, a neutrophilic culture and a mixed acidophilic/neutrophilic consortium) were immobilised on porous glass beads, packed into perspex columns and the three bioreactors percolated with synthetic medium for several months. Energy and carbon source utilisation, and tolerance to acid stress of the different consortia were evaluated. Acidophilic SRB were more efficient than the neutrophilic culture in coupling ethanol oxidation to sulfate reduction and all of the substrates tested were oxidised to acetic acid. The bioreactors containing acidophilic SRB reduced sulfate and generated alkalinity when challenged with influent at pH 3 and above, indicating that such bacteria have potential for bioremediating highly acidic waste waters. Average conversion rates of 0.25-0.30 g SO42- reduced dm(-3) day(-1) were achieved with bioreactors containing acidophilic SRB, percolated with a pH 4 liquid medium. (C) 2001 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 843
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly
    Banks, D
    Younger, PL
    Arnesen, RT
    Iversen, ER
    Banks, SB
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 1997, 32 (03): : 157 - 174
  • [2] Barnes LJ, 1994, EMERGING TECHNOLOGY, P38
  • [3] Biological treatment of acid mine drainage
    Boonstra, J
    van Lier, R
    Janssen, G
    Dijkman, H
    Buisman, CJN
    [J]. BIOHYDROMETALLURGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT TOWARD THE MINING OF THE 21ST CENTURY, PT B 1999, 1999, 9 : 559 - 567
  • [4] Clarke, 1996, COAL MINING WATER QU, V44
  • [6] TREATMENT OF METAL-CONTAMINATED WATER USING BACTERIAL SULFATE REDUCTION - RESULTS FROM PILOT-SCALE REACTORS
    DVORAK, DH
    HEDIN, RS
    EDENBORN, HM
    MCINTIRE, PE
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1992, 40 (05) : 609 - 616
  • [7] TREATMENT OF WATER FROM AN OPEN-PIT COPPER MINE USING BIOGENIC SULFIDE AND LIMESTONE - A FEASIBILITY STUDY
    HAMMACK, RW
    EDENBORN, HM
    DVORAK, DH
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1994, 28 (11) : 2321 - 2329
  • [8] Hard BC, 1997, MICROBIOL RES, V152, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0944-5013(97)80025-0
  • [9] BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING OF IRON AND SULFUR IN LEACHING ENVIRONMENTS
    JOHNSON, DB
    GHAURI, MA
    MCGINNESS, S
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1993, 11 (1-3) : 63 - 70
  • [10] ACIDOPHILIC MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES - CANDIDATES FOR BIOREMEDIATION OF ACIDIC MINE EFFLUENTS
    JOHNSON, DB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 1995, 35 (1-3) : 41 - 58