Employing nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to external cephalic version

被引:9
|
作者
Salim, Raed [1 ,2 ]
Zafran, Noah [1 ]
Nachum, Zohar [1 ,2 ]
Edelstein, Shmuel [1 ]
Shalev, Eliezer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Haemek Med Ctr, Off Prof E Shalev, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-18101 Afula, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
关键词
external cephalic version; nifedipine; ritodrine;
D O I
10.1080/00016340801996598
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. External cephalic version (ECV) is accepted as a means of reducing the rate of breech presentation at term. Routine use of tocolysis prior to an ECV has been described to increase its success rate. The study's objective was to evaluate the efficacy of oral nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to ECV, and to compare it with intravenous ritodrine (IR). Methods. Women with breech presentation at term considered suitable for ECV were given nifedipine prior to the procedure. The success rate was compared to a cohort of women who underwent an ECV attempt at our department during the years 1999-2002 using IR prior to the procedure. Power analysis indicated that 70 women were needed in each group to detect a difference of 25% from our baseline success rate of 50%. Results. Seventy-six women receiving nifedipine before their ECV attempt were compared to 90 women who received IR. Age, parity, gestational age at ECV, type of breech, placental location, fetal weight, and gestational age at delivery were not different between the groups. The overall success rate was 54% and 50% in the nifedipine and ritodrine groups respectively (p=0.6). The success rate among primiparous women was 35% and 29% respectively (p=0.8). The success rate among multiparous women was 64% and 63% respectively (p=1.0). The success rate was statistically different between primiparous and multiparous women in each group (p<0.05). Conclusion. Oral nifedipine may be as effective as IR when administered before ECV.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 437
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette, GP
    Boucher, M
    Theriault, D
    Rinfret, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (04) : 859 - 861
  • [2] Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version
    Ismail, Nor Azlin Mohamed
    Ibrahim, Maryasalwati
    Naim, Norzilawati Mohd
    Mahdy, Zaleha Abdullah
    Jamil, Mohammad Abdul
    Razi, Zainul Rashid Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (03) : 263 - 266
  • [3] Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study
    Levin, Gabriel
    Ezra, Yossef
    Weill, Yishay
    Kabiri, Doron
    Pollack, Raphael N.
    Rottenstreich, Amihai
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (18) : 3008 - 3013
  • [4] Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review
    Wilcox, C. B.
    Nassar, N.
    Roberts, C. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 423 - 428
  • [5] Sublingual nitroglycerin versus intravenous ritodrine as tocolytic for external cephalic version: A double-blinded randomized trial
    Bujold, E
    Marquette, GP
    Ferreira, E
    Gauthier, R
    Boucher, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1454 - 1457
  • [6] Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study
    Burgos, Jorge
    Eguiguren, Nekane
    Quintana, Eider
    Cobos, Patricia
    del Mar Centeno, Maria
    Larrieta, Rosa
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [7] Sublingual nitroglycerin versus placebo as a tocolytic for external cephalic version: A randomized controlled trial in parous women
    Bujold, E
    Boucher, M
    Rinfret, D
    Berman, S
    Ferreira, E
    Marquette, GP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1070 - 1073
  • [8] External cephalic version following prior cesarean delivery: A comparative cohort analysis
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Gallego-Pozuelo, Rosa Maria
    Dahmouni-Dahmouni, Hajar
    Blanco-Carnero, Jose Eliseo
    Araico-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Herrera-Gimenez, Javier
    Guijarro-Campillo, Alberto Rafael
    Nieto-Diaz, Anibal
    de Paco, Katy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (03) : 1066 - 1074
  • [9] Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?
    Kim, Sin Ae
    Cha, Eun-Hwan
    Chun, Kyoung-Chul
    Kim, Young Ah
    Koh, Jae-Whoan
    Han, Jung Yeol
    Hwang, Jong Hee
    OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2022, 65 (05) : 420 - 429
  • [10] The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version
    Stergiotou, Iosifina
    Talbot, Fleur
    Yoong, Wai
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (08) : 927 - 929