Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian dairy farms and mitigation options: An updated review

被引:37
|
作者
Jayasundara, Susantha [1 ]
Appuhamy, J. A. D. Ranga Niroshan [2 ]
Kebreab, Ermias [2 ]
Wagner-Riddle, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
dairy cattle; greenhouse gas; enteric fermentation; manure management; methane; nitrous oxide; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; FATTY-ACID-COMPOSITION; FED GRASS-SILAGE; SPECIAL TOPICS-MITIGATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS; ENTERIC METHANE; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; MILK-PRODUCTION; RUMINAL FERMENTATION;
D O I
10.1139/cjas-2015-0111
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This review examined methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) mitigation strategies for Canadian dairy farms. The primary focus was research conducted in Canada and cold climatic regions with similar dairy systems. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the impact of a given strategy when sufficient data were available. Results indicated that options to reduce enteric CH4 from dairy cows were increasing the dietary starch content and dietary lipid supplementation. Replacing barley or alfalfa silage with corn silage with higher starch content decreased enteric CH4 per unit of milk by 6%. Increasing dietary lipids from 3% to 6% of dry matter (DM) reduced enteric CH4 yield by 9%. Strategies such as nitrate supplementation and 3-nitrooxypropanol additive indicated potential for reducing enteric CH4 by about 30% but require extensive research on toxicology and consumer acceptance. Strategies to reduce emissions from manure are anaerobic digestion, composting, solid - liquid separation, covering slurry storage and flaring CH4, and reducing methanogen inoculum by complete emptying of slurry storage at spring application. These strategies have potential to reduce emissions from manure by up to 50%. An integrated approach of combining strategies through diet and manure management is necessary for significant GHG mitigation and lowering carbon footprint of milk produced in Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 331
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields in Japan and mitigation options: a review
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 70 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [2] Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review
    Gerber, P. J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H.
    Oh, J.
    Lee, C.
    Meinen, R.
    Montes, F.
    Ott, T.
    Firkins, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Dell, C.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W. Z.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Oosting, S.
    ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 220 - 234
  • [3] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    Zheng X.
    Wang M.
    Wang Y.
    Shen R.
    Li J.
    Heyer J.
    Koegge M.
    Papen H.
    Jin J.
    Li L.
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 17 (1) : 83 - 92
  • [4] Mitigation options for methane, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from agricultural ecosystems
    Zheng, XH
    Wang, MX
    Wang, YS
    Shen, RX
    Li, J
    Heyer, J
    Koegge, M
    Papen, H
    Jin, JS
    Li, LT
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2000, 17 (01) : 83 - 92
  • [5] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and NitricOxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    郑循华
    王明星
    王跃思
    沈壬兴
    李晶
    J.Heyer
    M.Koegge
    H.Papen
    金继生
    李老土
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, (01) : 83 - 92
  • [6] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: A review
    Kebreab, E.
    Clark, K.
    Wagner-Riddle, C.
    France, J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (02) : 135 - 158
  • [7] Dietary Nitrate for Methane Mitigation Leads to Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Dairy Cows
    Petersen, S. O.
    Hellwing, A. L. F.
    Brask, M.
    Hojberg, O.
    Poulsen, M.
    Zhu, Z.
    Baral, Khagendra R.
    Lund, P.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (04) : 1063 - 1070
  • [8] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Firkins, J. L.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W.
    Lee, C.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5045 - 5069
  • [9] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options
    Hristov, A. N.
    Ott, T.
    Tricarico, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Waghorn, G.
    Adesogan, A.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Montes, F.
    Oh, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Oosting, S. J.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Firkins, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5095 - 5113
  • [10] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options
    Montes, F.
    Meinen, R.
    Dell, C.
    Rotz, A.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Waghorn, G.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Dijkstra, J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5070 - 5094