On ramped vanes to control normal shock boundary layer interactions

被引:15
作者
Lee, S. [1 ]
Loth, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Mech Engn, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Mech & Aerosp Engn, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
Shock-induced Flow Separation; Flow Control; Vortex Generators; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; VORTEX GENERATORS; COMPRESSION-RAMP; SEPARATION; MICRORAMPS; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2018.88
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A novel vortex generator design positioned upstream of a normal shock followed by a subsequent diffuser was investigated using large eddy simulations. In particular, "ramped-vane" flow control devices with three different heights relative to the incoming boundary layer thickness (0.34 delta, 0.52 delta and 0.75 delta) were placed in a supersonic boundary layer with a freestream Mach number of 1.3 and a Reynolds number of 2400 based on the momentum thickness. This is the first numerical study to investigate the size effect of the ramped-vane for flow control device in terms of shape factor, flow separation and flow unsteadiness. The results showed that these devices generated strong streamwise vortices that entrained high-momentum fluid to the near-wall region and increased turbulent mixing. The devices also decreased shock-induced flow separation, which resulted in a higher downstream skin friction in the diffuser. In general, the largest ramped-vane (0.75 delta) produced the largest reductions in flow separation, shape factor and overall unsteadiness. These results and a careful review of the literature study also determined the quantitative correlation of optimum VG height with Mach number, whereby h/delta similar to 1 is often optimum for incompressible flows while higher Mach numbers lead to small optimum heights, tending towards h/delta similar to 0.45 at M = 2.5.
引用
收藏
页码:1568 / 1585
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Direct simulation of the turbulent boundary layer along a compression ramp at M=3 and Reθ=1685 [J].
Adams, NA .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2000, 420 :47-83
[2]  
Anderson B., 2006, 20063197 AIAA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, TURBULENT SHEAR LAYE, DOI DOI 10.1007/B137383
[4]   Microramp Control of Supersonic Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions [J].
Babinsky, H. ;
Li, Y. ;
Ford, C. W. Pitt .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (03) :668-675
[5]   REDUCTION OF FLUCTUATING PRESSURE LOADS IN SHOCK BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTIONS USING VORTEX GENERATORS [J].
BARTER, JW ;
DOLLING, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (10) :1842-1849
[6]   IMPLICIT FINITE-DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM FOR HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS IN CONSERVATION-LAW FORM [J].
BEAM, RM ;
WARMING, RF .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (01) :87-110
[7]   Plasma Control of a Turbulent Shock Boundary-Layer Interaction [J].
Bisek, Nicholas J. ;
Rizzetta, Donald P. ;
Poggie, Jonathan .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (08) :1789-1804
[8]   Effects of micro-ramps on a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction [J].
Blinde, Paul L. ;
Humble, Ray A. ;
van Oudheusden, Bas W. ;
Scarano, Fulvio .
SHOCK WAVES, 2009, 19 (06) :507-520
[9]  
Boris J.P., 1989, LECT NOTE PHYS, V257, P344
[10]  
BRUCE P., 2010, 45 S APPL AER MARS