Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation

被引:69
作者
Martin, Brook I. [1 ]
Mirza, Sohail K. [1 ]
Flum, David R. [2 ,3 ]
Wickizer, Thomas M. [4 ]
Heagerty, Patrick J. [5 ]
Lenkoski, Alex F. [6 ]
Deyo, Richard A. [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Outcomes Policy & Evaluat Studies, Div Hlth Serv Management & Policy, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Appl Math, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Family Med, Kaiser Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[8] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Med, Kaiser Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[9] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Kaiser Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[10] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Kaiser Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[11] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Ctr Res Occupat & Environm Tox, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Lumbar spine surgery; Herniated disc; Decompression; Repeat surgery; Quality; Back pain; RESEARCH TRIAL SPORT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINE SURGERY; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; REOPERATION RATES; SCIATICA SECONDARY; REPORT CARDS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Repeat lumbar spine surgery is generally an undesirable outcome. Variation in repeat surgery rates may be because of patient characteristics, disease severity, or hospital-and surgeon-related factors. However, little is known about population-level variation in reoperation rates. PURPOSE: To examine hospital-and surgeon-level variation in reoperation rates after lumbar herniated disc surgery and to relate these to published benchmarks. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of a discharge registry including all nonfederal hospitals in Washington State. METHODS: We identified adults who underwent an initial inpatient lumbar decompression for herniated disc from 1997 to 2007. We then performed generalized linear mixed-effect logistic regressions, controlling for patient characteristics and comorbidity, to examine the variation in reoperation rates within 90 days, 1 year, and 4 years. RESULTS: Our cohort included 29,529 patients with a mean age of 47.5 years, 61% privately insured, and 15% having any comorbidity. The age-, sex-, insurance-, and comorbidity-adjusted mean rate of reoperation among hospitals was 1.9% at 90 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.1), with a range from 1.1% to 3.4%; 6.4% at 1 year (95% CI, 3.9-10.6), with a range from 2.8% to 12.5%; and 13.8% at 4 years (95% CI, 8.8-19.8), with a range from 8.1% to 24.5%. The adjusted mean reoperation rates of surgeons were 1.9% at 90 days (95% CI, 1.4-2.4) with a range from 1.2% to 4.6%, 6.1% at 1 year (95% CI, 4.8-7.7) with a range from 4.3% to 10.5%, and 13.2% at 4 years (95% CI, 11.3-15.5) with a range from 10.0% to 19.3%. Multilevel random-effect models suggested that variation across surgeons was greater than that of hospitals and that this effect increased with long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Even after adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidity, we observed a large variation in reoperation rates across hospitals and surgeons after lumbar discectomy, a relatively simple spinal procedure. These findings suggest uncertainty about indications for repeat surgery, variations in perioperative care, or variations in quality of care. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 97
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Agency EP, 1996, FED REGISTER, V61
[2]   RECURRENT LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION AFTER SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR DISCECTOMY: INCIDENCE AND HEALTH CARE COST ANALYSIS [J].
Ambrossi, Giannina L. Garces ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Long, Donlin M. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (03) :574-578
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NAT PRIOR GOALS AL O
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, HOSP PAT DAT SYST CO
[5]   Tubular Diskectomy vs Conventional Microdiskectomy for Sciatica A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Arts, Mark P. ;
Brand, Ronald ;
van den Akker, M. Elske ;
Koes, Bart W. ;
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. ;
Peul, Wilco C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (02) :149-158
[6]   The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .2. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1777-1786
[7]   Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Wu, YA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :927-935
[8]   Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation - Five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Chang, YC ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (10) :1179-1187
[9]   Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy - A prospective, randomized study [J].
Buttermann, GR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (04) :670-679
[10]   Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: The effects of fragment type and anular competence [J].
Carragee, EJ ;
Han, MY ;
Suen, PW ;
Kim, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (01) :102-108