Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies

被引:16
作者
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan [1 ]
Noble, Adam [2 ]
Clark, Simon [3 ]
Wilby, Martin [3 ]
Freeman, Brian J. C. [4 ]
Fehlings, Michael G. [5 ,6 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [7 ]
Marson, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Walton Ctr NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Spinal Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Spinal Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Spine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
HERNIATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225907
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area. There is significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting for CES, which does not allow data synthesis between studies. The hypothesis is that a COS for CES can be developed for future research studies using patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as key stakeholders. Methods and findings Qualitative semi-structured interviews with CES patients were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo to identify the outcomes of importance. These were combined with the outcomes obtained from a published systematic literature review of CES patients. The outcomes were grouped into a list of 37, for rating through two rounds of an international Delphi survey according to pre-set criteria. The Delphi survey had an overall response rate of 63% and included 172 participants (104 patients, 68 HCPs) from 14 countries who completed both rounds. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus at the end of the Delphi survey and there was no attrition bias detected. The results were discussed at an international consensus meeting attended by 34 key stakeholders (16 patients and 18 HCPs) from 8 countries. A further three outcomes were agreed to be included. There was no selection bias detected at the consensus meeting. There are 16 outcomes in total in the CESCOS. Discussion This is the first study in the literature that has determined the core outcomes in CES using a transparent international consensus process involving healthcare professionals and CES patients as key stakeholders. This COS is recommended as the most important outcomes to be reported in any research study investigating CES outcomes and will allow evidence synthesis in CES.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? - a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Clarke, Mike
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [22] Complaints of micturition, defecation and sexual function in cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review
    Korse, N. S.
    Jacobs, W. C. H.
    Elzevier, H. W.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, C. L. A. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (05) : 1019 - 1029
  • [23] The long term outcome of micturition, defecation and sexual function after spinal surgery for cauda equina syndrome
    Korse, Nina S.
    Veldman, Anna B.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [24] Kostuik JP., 1993, Current Opinion in Orthopaedics, V4, P125
  • [25] How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline
    Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.
    Vohra, Sunita
    Rose, Michael R.
    Boers, Maarten
    Tugwell, Peter
    Clarke, Mike
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [26] Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for cauda equina syndrome: systematic literature review, qualitative interviews, Delphi survey and consensus meeting
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    Noble, Adam J.
    Wilby, Martin
    Clark, Simon
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Marson, Anthony Guy
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [27] Outcomes Reported After Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome A Systematic Literature Review
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    Wilby, Martin
    Clark, Simon
    Noble, Adam
    Williamson, Paula
    Marson, Tony
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (17) : E1005 - E1013
  • [28] Does Early Surgical Decompression in Cauda Equina Syndrome Improve Bladder Outcome?
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    Boissaud-Cooke, Matthew Alexander
    Clark, Simon
    Wilby, Martin John
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (08) : 580 - 583
  • [29] Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Clarke, Mike
    Devane, Declan
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [30] Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study
    Woodfield, Julie
    Hoeritzauer, Ingrid
    Jamjoom, Aimun A. B.
    Pronin, Savva
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    Poon, Michael
    Roy, Holly
    Demetriades, Andreas K.
    Sell, Philip
    Eames, Niall
    Statham, Patrick F. X.
    Edlman, Ellie
    Ma, Ruichong
    Poon, Michael
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (12):