Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies

被引:16
作者
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan [1 ]
Noble, Adam [2 ]
Clark, Simon [3 ]
Wilby, Martin [3 ]
Freeman, Brian J. C. [4 ]
Fehlings, Michael G. [5 ,6 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [7 ]
Marson, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Walton Ctr NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Spinal Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Spinal Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Spine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
HERNIATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225907
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area. There is significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting for CES, which does not allow data synthesis between studies. The hypothesis is that a COS for CES can be developed for future research studies using patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as key stakeholders. Methods and findings Qualitative semi-structured interviews with CES patients were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo to identify the outcomes of importance. These were combined with the outcomes obtained from a published systematic literature review of CES patients. The outcomes were grouped into a list of 37, for rating through two rounds of an international Delphi survey according to pre-set criteria. The Delphi survey had an overall response rate of 63% and included 172 participants (104 patients, 68 HCPs) from 14 countries who completed both rounds. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus at the end of the Delphi survey and there was no attrition bias detected. The results were discussed at an international consensus meeting attended by 34 key stakeholders (16 patients and 18 HCPs) from 8 countries. A further three outcomes were agreed to be included. There was no selection bias detected at the consensus meeting. There are 16 outcomes in total in the CESCOS. Discussion This is the first study in the literature that has determined the core outcomes in CES using a transparent international consensus process involving healthcare professionals and CES patients as key stakeholders. This COS is recommended as the most important outcomes to be reported in any research study investigating CES outcomes and will allow evidence synthesis in CES.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation - A meta-analysis of surgical outcomes
    Ahn, UM
    Ahn, NU
    Buchowski, JM
    Garrett, ES
    Sieber, AN
    Kostuik, JP
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (12) : 1515 - 1522
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, RES SENSITIVE TOPICS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, TRIALS, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13063-017-1788-8
  • [4] Reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing cauda equina syndrome
    Balasubramanian, Karthikeyan
    Kalsi, Pratipal
    Greenough, Charles G.
    Seetharam, Manjunath Prasad Kuskoor
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 24 (04) : 383 - 386
  • [5] Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys
    Biggane, Alice M.
    Brading, Lucy
    Ravaud, Philippe
    Young, Bridget
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [6] Core information set for oesophageal cancer surgery
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Macefield, R.
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Jacobs, M.
    McNair, A. G. K.
    Sprangers, M.
    Brookes, S. T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (08) : 936 - 943
  • [7] Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
    Brookes, Sara T.
    Macefield, Rhiannon C.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    McNair, Angus G.
    Potter, Shelley
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Strong, Sean
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [8] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [9] Review of Medicolegal Cases for Cauda Equina Syndrome: What Factors Lead to an Adverse Outcome for the Provider?
    Daniels, Eldra W.
    Gordon, Zachary
    French, Keisha
    Ahn, Uri M.
    Ahn, Nicholas U.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (03) : E414 - E419
  • [10] A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery
    Dodd, Susanna
    Clarke, Mike
    Becker, Lorne
    Mavergames, Chris
    Fish, Rebecca
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 96 : 84 - 92