Digital Health Paradox: International Policy Perspectives to Address Increased Health Inequalities for People Living With Disabilities

被引:71
作者
van Kessel, Robin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hrzic, Rok [1 ]
O'Nuallain, Ella [4 ]
Weir, Elizabeth [5 ]
Wong, Brian Li Han [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Anderson, Michael [8 ]
Baron-Cohen, Simon [5 ]
Mossialos, Elias [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Int Hlth, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, NL-6211 LK Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Studio Europa, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] WHO, Global Hlth Workforce Network Youth Hub, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Deloitte Consulting Pty Ltd, Publ Sect Strategy Team, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Cambridge, Autism Res Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[6] Grad Inst, Global Hlth Ctr, Lancet & Financial Times Commiss Governing Hlth F, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] European Publ Hlth Assoc Digital Hlth Sect, Steering Comm, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[9] Imperial Coll London, Inst Global Hlth Innovat, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
digital health; eHealth; health policy; health systems; disability; inclusion; digital technologies; people living with disabilities; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY; CARE EXPERIENCES; AUTISTIC ADULTS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; TELEHEALTH;
D O I
10.2196/33819
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the uptake of digital health worldwide and highlighted many benefits of these innovations. However, it also stressed the magnitude of inequalities regarding accessing digital health. Using a scoping review, this article explores the potential benefits of digital technologies for the global population, with particular reference to people living with disabilities, using the autism community as a case study. We ultimately explore policies in Sweden, Australia, Canada, Estonia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to learn how policies can lay an inclusive foundation for digital health systems. We conclude that digital health ecosystems should be designed with health equity at the forefront to avoid deepening existing health inequalities. We call for a more sophisticated understanding of digital health literacy to better assess the readiness to adopt digital health innovations. Finally, people living with disabilities should be positioned at the center of digital health policy and innovations to ensure they are not left behind.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Anderton CH, 2019, PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT ECONOMICS: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF WAR, TERRORISM, GENOCIDE, AND PEACE, P59
[2]   Telemedicine barriers and challenges for persons with disabilities: COVID-19 and beyond [J].
Annaswamy, Thiru M. ;
Verduzco-Gutierrez, Monica ;
Frieden, Lex .
DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (04)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, DIS IMP ALL US INF
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Union of Equality: Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030, DOI DOI 10.2767/31633
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, EST WHO WORK TOG DIG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Measuring Digital Development: Facts and Figures
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, E GOV DEV IND COUNTR
[8]   Telehealth and Legal Implications for Nurse Practitioners [J].
Balestra, Melanie .
JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2018, 14 (01) :33-39
[9]   Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet? [J].
Davina Banner ;
Marc Bains ;
Sandra Carroll ;
Damanpreet K Kandola ;
Danielle E Rolfe ;
Caroline Wong ;
Ian D. Graham .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 5 (1)
[10]   Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 [J].
Budd, Jobie ;
Miller, Benjamin S. ;
Manning, Erin M. ;
Lampos, Vasileios ;
Zhuang, Mengdie ;
Edelstein, Michael ;
Rees, Geraint ;
Emery, Vincent C. ;
Stevens, Molly M. ;
Keegan, Neil ;
Short, Michael J. ;
Pillay, Deenan ;
Manley, Ed ;
Cox, Ingemar J. ;
Heymann, David ;
Johnson, Anne M. ;
McKendry, Rachel A. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (08) :1183-1192