Development and psychometric testing of a short version of the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form for cancer patients

被引:20
作者
Chou, Pi-Ling [2 ]
Rau, Kun-Ming [3 ]
Lin, Chia-Chin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Coll Nursing, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Grad Inst Nursing, Coll Nursing, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Kaohsiung Med Ctr, Div Hematol Oncol,Dept Internal Med,Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Wan Fang Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Hesitancy to using analgesics; Cancer pain; Instrument development; Reliability; Validity; PAIN MANAGEMENT; OVERCOMING BARRIERS; EDUCATION-PROGRAM; ANALGESIC REGIMEN; OUTPATIENTS; ADHERENCE; INTERVENTION; PREVALENCE; MEDICATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: A comprehensive assessment of patient hesitancy to use analgesics and accurate knowledge related to the promotion of analgesic adherence is necessary for effective pain management. Unfortunately, there has been a lack of a short and concise questionnaire to assess patients' hesitancy to use analgesics in clinical practice. Objective: This paper is a report of the development and psychometric properties of the short version of the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form (S-BQT). Design: This study employed a descriptive design. Setting: A convenience sample was recruited from oncology clinics at two medical centers in Taiwan. Participants: One hundred and eighty-three (N = 183) patients receiving analgesics for cancer pain participated in the study. Methods: Instruments included the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form (BQT), the Taiwanese version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Measure-Taiwan form (MMAM-T). Two self-administered questionnaires were performed at the same time, and the ratio of analgesic usage was computed over a two-week period. Reliability was established by calculating Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. The validity was estimated by construct validity, criterion-related validity, and known group validity. Results: To develop the S-BQT, we used reliability analysis to extract nine items from nine subscales. Internal consistency of the S-BQT was indicated by a Cronbach's alphas score of 0.86. Test-retest reliability was assessed as 0.83 over a two-week interval. Factor analysis revealed two factor structures. Criterion-related validity was examined by correlating the S-BQT score, and MMAM-T score, and the ratio of analgesic use. Known group validity was examined by comparing the S-BQT scores of patients with hesitancy to report pain and take analgesics vs. patients demonstrating no such hesitancy in the previous week. Known group validity was also established by comparing the S-BQT scores among patients with low, moderate, and high adherence to the usage of medication. Conclusions: The S-BQT shows excellent reliability and validity. The use of this instrument can help to improve communication between patients and clinicians regarding the use of analgesics in the management of pain. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1079
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AHCPR, 1994, Management of Cancer Pain, Clinical Practice Guideline
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, PLYM M PA
[3]   Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: A prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution [J].
Buccheri, G ;
Ferrigno, D ;
Tamburini, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (07) :1135-1141
[4]   A longitudinal study of the role of patient-reported outcomes on survival prediction of palliative cancer inpatients in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Jing-An ;
Lin, Chia-Chin .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2009, 17 (10) :1285-1294
[5]   Overcoming patient-related barriers to cancer pain management for home care patients - A pilot study [J].
Chang, MC ;
Chang, YC ;
Chiou, JF ;
Tsou, TS ;
Lin, CC .
CANCER NURSING, 2002, 25 (06) :470-476
[6]   Patient-related barriers to cancer pain management in a palliative care setting in Hong Kong [J].
Chung, TK ;
French, P ;
Chan, S .
CANCER NURSING, 1999, 22 (03) :196-203
[7]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73
[8]   Cancer pain management at home (II): does age influence attitudes towards pain and analgesia? [J].
Closs, S. Jose ;
Chatwin, J. ;
Bennett, Michael I. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2009, 17 (07) :781-786
[9]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
[10]   Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature [J].
Deandrea, S. ;
Montanari, M. ;
Moja, L. ;
Apolone, G. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (12) :1985-1991