Adaptive network reliability analysis: Methodology and applications to power grid

被引:36
作者
Dehghani, Nariman L. [1 ]
Zamanian, Soroush [1 ]
Shafieezadeh, Abdollah [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Risk Assessment & Management Struct & Infrastruct, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Flow network reliability; Active learning; Surrogate models; Bayesian additive regression trees; Deep neural networks; Subset simulation; SMALL FAILURE PROBABILITIES; SUBSET SIMULATION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; REGRESSION; SYSTEMS; MODEL; CAPACITY; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107973
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Flow network models can capture the underlying physics and operational constraints of many networked systems including the power grid and transportation and water networks. However, analyzing systems' reliability using computationally expensive flow-based models faces substantial challenges, especially for rare events. Existing actively trained meta-models, which present a new promising direction in reliability analysis, are not applicable to networks due to the inability of these methods to handle high-dimensional problems as well as discrete or mixed variable inputs. This study presents the first Adaptive surrogate-based Network Reliability (ANR) analysis through integration of Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). An active learning method is developed that identifies the most valuable training samples based on the credible intervals derived by BART over the space of predictor variables as well as the proximity of the points to the estimated limit state. Benchmark power grids including IEEE 30, 57, 118, and 300-bus systems and their power flow models for cascading failure analysis are considered to investigate ANR-BART, MCS, subset simulation, and passively-trained optimal BART and deep neural networks. Results indicate that ANR-BART is robust and yields accurate estimates of network failure probability, while significantly reducing the computational cost of reliability analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. ;
Relun, N. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 111 :232-240
[22]   AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation [J].
Echard, B. ;
Gayton, N. ;
Lemaire, M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :145-154
[23]  
Erhan D, 2010, J MACH LEARN RES, V11, P625
[24]   A probabilistic model for estimating the effects of photovoltaic sources on the power systems reliability [J].
Faza, Ayman .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 171 :67-77
[25]   Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method [J].
Gaspar, B. ;
Teixeira, A. P. ;
Guedes Soares, C. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 165 :277-291
[26]  
Glover J. D., 2012, Power System Analysis & Design
[27]   Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights and auxiliary nodes [J].
Guidotti, Roberto ;
Gardoni, Paolo ;
Chen, Yuguo .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2017, 65 :12-26
[28]   K-terminal network reliability measures with binary decision diagrams [J].
Hardy, Gary ;
Lucet, Corinne ;
Lininios, Nikolaos .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2007, 56 (03) :506-515
[29]  
Hastie T, 2000, STAT SCI, V15, P196
[30]   Bayesian Additive Regression Trees using Bayesian model averaging [J].
Hernandez, Belinda ;
Raftery, Adrian E. ;
Pennington, Stephen R. ;
Parnell, Andrew C. .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2018, 28 (04) :869-890