How Friedman's View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory

Friedman's view on corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often accused of being incoherent and of setting rather low ethical standards for managers. This paper outlines Friedman's ethical expectations for corporate executives against the backdrop of the strong emphasis he puts on individual freedom. Doing so reveals that the ethical standards he imposes on managers can be strictly deduced from individual freedom and that these standards involve both deontological norms and the fulfillment of particular stakeholder expectations. These insights illustrate the necessity to reconsider how Friedman's approach relates to other important normative theories of business ethics. Contrasting Friedman's approach with stakeholder theory and integrative social contract theorywhen considering the importance he assigns to individual freedomshows how and why these approaches differ. Still, the comparison also highlights striking similarities. This paper contributes to a better understanding of Friedman's positionwhich is still one of the most influential approaches in business ethics researchbecause it enables a differentiated look at its strengths and weaknesses.