Improvements in advance care planning in the veterans affairs system - Results of a multifaceted intervention

被引:95
作者
Pearlman, RA
Starks, H
Cain, KC
Cole, WG
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Med Hist & Eth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Lewis & Clark Coll, Dept Psychol, Portland, OR 97219 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.6.667
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) aims to 0 Guide health care in the event of decisional incapacity. Interventions to promote ACP have had limited effectiveness. We conducted an educational and motivational intervention in Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinics to increase ACP use and proxy and health care provider understanding of patients' preferences and values. Methods: We recruited 23 providers and up to 14 of each of their patients; the patients were randomized to the control or intervention group. Eligibility criteria included a preexisting relationship with the provider, age 55 years or older, chronic health condition(s), and no recorded advance directive. The intervention group (n = 119) received an ACP workbook, motivational counseling by social workers, and cues to providers to discuss ACP. The control group (n = 129) received an advance directive booklet. Results: The intervention patients reported more ACP discussions with their providers (64% vs 38%; P <.001). Living wills were filed in the medical record twice as often in the intervention group (48% vs 23%; P <.001). Provider-patient dyads in the intervention group had higher agreement scores than the control group for treatment preferences, values, and personal beliefs (58% vs 48%, 57% vs 46%, and 61% vs 47%, respectively; P <.01. for all comparisons). The agreement scores for the proxy-patient dyads did not differ between groups for treatment preferences and values, but were higher in the intervention than the control group for personal beliefs (67% vs 56%). Conclusion: This intervention demonstrates mixed results and highlights the ongoing challenges of helping health care providers and potential proxy decision makers represent patient preferences and values.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 674
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, 3rd Edn
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[3]   Practical methods to increase use of advance medical directives [J].
Brown, JB ;
Beck, A ;
Boles, M ;
Barrett, P .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (01) :21-26
[4]  
Buchanan AllenE., 1989, DECIDING OTHERS ETHI
[5]   METAPHOR GRAPHICS TO SUPPORT INTEGRATED DECISION-MAKING WITH RESPIRATORY DATA [J].
COLE, WG ;
STEWART, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1993, 10 (02) :91-100
[6]   Accuracy of primary care and hospital-based physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' treatment preferences with and without advance directives [J].
Coppola, KM ;
Ditto, PH ;
Danks, JH ;
Smucker, WD .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) :431-440
[7]   Effectiveness of computer-generated reminders for increasing discussions about advance directives and completion of advance directive forms - A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Dexter, PR ;
Wolinsky, FD ;
Gramelspacher, GP ;
Zhou, XH ;
Eckert, GJ ;
Waisburd, M ;
Tierney, WM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (02) :102-+
[8]  
Ditto PH, 1996, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V15, P332, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.15.5.332
[9]   Advance directives as acts of communication -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Ditto, PH ;
Danks, JH ;
Smucker, WD ;
Bookwala, J ;
Coppola, KM ;
Dresser, R ;
Fagerlin, A ;
Gready, RM ;
Houts, RM ;
Lockhart, LK ;
Zyzanski, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) :421-430
[10]   Enough - The failure of the living will [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Schneider, CE .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2004, 34 (02) :30-42