Emotion regulation in context: Examining the spontaneous use of strategies across emotional intensity and type of emotion

被引:121
|
作者
Dixon-Gordon, Katherine L. [1 ]
Aldao, Amelia [2 ]
De Los Reyes, Andres [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, Comprehens Assessment & Intervent Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Emotion; Emotion regulation; Regulation strategies; GENERALIZED ESTIMATING EQUATIONS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Emerging research suggests that two features of emotional contexts (emotion intensity, emotion type) predict spontaneous use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies. However, prior work has not examined the interactive effects of emotion intensity and emotion type on the selection of specific ER strategies. This is a noteworthy omission because in real life, emotional situations are characterized by a combination of emotion intensity and type. We recruited 562 participants and asked them to report their use of 7 ER strategies across self-identified stressful contexts that varied in emotion intensity (moderate, high) and primary emotion elicited (anger, anxiety, sadness). Participants reported using ER strategies to a greater extent in high versus moderate emotionally intense contexts, and in response to sadness (versus anger). Further, high intensity sadness prompted greater use of expressive suppression than other contexts. Our findings underscore the importance of taking into account emotional contextual features as predictors of spontaneous ER. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of Multiple Regulation Strategies in Spontaneous Emotion Regulation
    Paul Lucian Szasz
    Madalina Coman
    Joshua Curtiss
    Joseph K. Carpenter
    Stefan G. Hofmann
    International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 2018, 11 : 249 - 261
  • [2] Use of Multiple Regulation Strategies in Spontaneous Emotion Regulation
    Szasz, Paul Lucian
    Coman, Madalina
    Curtiss, Joshua
    Carpenter, Joseph K.
    Hofmann, Stefan G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE THERAPY, 2018, 11 (03): : 249 - 261
  • [3] Spontaneous and instructed emotion regulation in dysphoria: Effects on emotion experience and use of other emotion regulation strategies
    Jessica Balderas
    Steven L. Bistricky
    Staci Schield
    Mary B. Short
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 6257 - 6270
  • [4] Spontaneous and instructed emotion regulation in dysphoria: Effects on emotion experience and use of other emotion regulation strategies
    Balderas, Jessica
    Bistricky, Steven L.
    Schield, Staci
    Short, Mary B.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (08) : 6257 - 6270
  • [5] Use of emotion regulation strategies across family systems
    Saleem, Tamkeen
    Gul, Seema
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 47 (03) : 228 - 235
  • [6] Emotion beliefs are associated with emotion regulation strategies and emotional distress
    Ilyana Arbulu
    José M. Salguero
    Juan Ramos-Cejudo
    Johan Bjureberg
    James J. Gross
    Current Psychology, 2024, 43 : 4364 - 4373
  • [7] Emotion beliefs are associated with emotion regulation strategies and emotional distress
    Arbulu, Ilyana
    Salguero, Jose M.
    Ramos-Cejudo, Juan
    Bjureberg, Johan
    Gross, James J.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (05) : 4364 - 4373
  • [8] The predictive effect of trait emotional intelligence on emotion regulation strategies: The mediating role of negative emotion intensity
    Gao, Zihan
    Yang, Yingli
    SYSTEM, 2023, 112
  • [9] Emotional context, maternal behavior and emotion regulation
    Roque, Lisa
    Verissimo, Manuela
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 34 (04): : 617 - 626
  • [10] Video games in adolescence and emotional functioning: Emotion regulation, emotion intensity, emotion expression, and alexithymia
    Gaetan, Sophie
    Brejard, Vincent
    Bonnet, Agnes
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 61 : 344 - 349