Farmers Engaged in Deliberative Practices; An Ethnographic Exploration of the Mosaic of Concerns in Livestock Agriculture

被引:36
作者
Driessen, Clemens [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Appl Philosophy Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Livestock farming; Farmers' ethics; Ethnography; Sustainability; Convention theory; ANIMAL-WELFARE; FOOD; ECONOMY; CONTEXT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10806-010-9293-z
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A plethora of ethical issues in livestock agriculture has emerged to public attention in recent decades, of which environmental and animal welfare concerns are but two, albeit prominent, themes. For livestock agriculture to be considered sustainable, somehow these interconnected themes need to be addressed. Ethical debate on these issues has been extensive, but mostly started from and focused on single issues. The views of farmers in these debates have been largely absent, or merely figured as interests, instead of being considered morally worthwhile themselves. In this paper the relevance for ethical debates of the ways farmers discuss and engage with moral concerns is explored. The variety of norms that figure in contemporary farming practices is sketched in its multifarious complexity, illustrated by ethnographic fieldwork, and systematized in terms of "orders of worth." Reviewing the practical arguments and commitments of farmers within this framework reveals that farming practices are subject to mixed motives, in which an amalgam of types of concerns play a role. Recognition of the peculiarly entangled nature of the ethics of farming practices could counter the tendency in policy making, technological innovation, and ethical thought to compartmentalize our moral landscape. Understanding farming practice as the integration of a mosaic of concerns in the light of a variety of moral experiences would foster public appreciation of positions of farmers in debates on improving the sustainability and societal acceptability of livestock agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 179
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, AVAILABLE LIGHT ANTH
[2]   Sustainable agriculture is humane, humane agriculture is sustainable [J].
Appleby, MC .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2005, 18 (03) :293-303
[3]  
Baars T., 1995, Some practical aspects ofpreventing disease in organic husbandry, health promotion, natural behaviour enhancement
[4]  
Beauchamp TL., 2009, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[5]   Consumer Rights to Informed Choice on the Food Market [J].
Beekman, Volkert .
ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2008, 11 (01) :61-72
[6]  
Birnbacher D., 1999, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, V2, P319, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009903815157
[7]  
Boltanski L., 1999, European Journal of Social Theory, V2, P359, DOI [10.1177/136843199002003010, DOI 10.1177/136843199002003010]
[8]  
Boltanski L., 2006, On Justification. The Economies of Worth
[9]  
Bos A.P., 2008, Social Epistemology, V22, P29, DOI DOI 10.1080/02691720701773502
[10]   The moral economy of grades and standards [J].
Busch, L .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (03) :273-283