Strain gauges debonding fault detection for structural health monitoring

被引:38
作者
dos Reis, Joao [1 ]
Costa, Carlos Oliveira [1 ]
da Costa, Jose Sa [2 ]
机构
[1] Sci Instrumentat Ctr, LNEC, Ave Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Intelligent Syst IDMEC, Inst Super Tecn, Ave Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
loop current step response (LCSR) method; self-diagnosis sensor; strain measurement; temperature measurement; thermal sensors; SENSOR VALIDATION; SELF-VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPLEMENTATION; FUSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/stc.2264
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Physical redundancy is a common approach in applications with safety-critical systems. But that is not always possible in some structural health monitoring (SHM) applications whether for economic, spatial, or safety reasons. Many SHM sensor validating applications only rely on analytical redundancy. In such circumstances, sensor faults and structural damage need to be assuredly discriminated. A self-diagnosis strain sensor operating in a continuous online SHM scenario is considered. The sensor is based on a full electric resistance strain gauge Wheatstone bridge. The state of the art shows that such a sensor has not yet been developed. The loop current step response (LCSR) is a well-known method to detect strain gauge debonding. However, applying the LCSR method to a full strain gauge Wheatstone bridge has some limitations analyzed in this paper. Two new methods for detecting strain gauge debonding are proposed and evaluated. These methods are based on consistency checking of the strain gauges grids temperature measurementsemploying an array of (a) digital contact temperature sensors or (b) quasi-contact microelectromechanical system thermopile sensors. The experimental results reveal that both methods are suitable for application in an SHM self-diagnosis sensor scenario. However, the quasi-contact measuring method showed to be more sensitive to the strain gauge grid debonding fault though.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 1626962014 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, UNC MEAS 3
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Experimental stress analysis
[4]  
Barberree DA, 2003, AIP CONF PROC, V684, P1097, DOI 10.1063/1.1627276
[5]   Status Self-Validation of Sensor Arrays Using Gray Forecasting Model and Bootstrap Method [J].
Chen, Yinsheng ;
Yang, Jingli ;
Xu, Yonghui ;
Jiang, Shouda ;
Liu, Xiaodong ;
Wang, Qi .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2016, 65 (07) :1626-1640
[6]   Model-based validation of a DOx sensor [J].
Clarke, DW ;
Fraher, PMA .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 1996, 4 (09) :1313-1320
[7]   Modeling and Experimental Testing of Strain Gauges in Operational and Failure Modes [J].
Ellis, Brent L. ;
Smith, L. Montgomery .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2009, 58 (07) :2222-2227
[8]   A review of self-validating sensor technology [J].
Feng, Zhigang ;
Wang, Qi ;
Shida, Katsunori .
SENSOR REVIEW, 2007, 27 (01) :48-56
[9]   Design and Implementation of a Self-Validating Pressure Sensor [J].
Feng, Zhigang ;
Wang, Qi ;
Shida, Katsunori .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (03) :207-218
[10]   FAULT-DIAGNOSIS IN DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS USING ANALYTICAL AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED REDUNDANCY - A SURVEY AND SOME NEW RESULTS [J].
FRANK, PM .
AUTOMATICA, 1990, 26 (03) :459-474