Balancing continuous and categorical baseline covariates in sequential clinical trials using the area between empirical cumulative distribution functions

被引:22
作者
Lin, Yunzhi [2 ]
Su, Zheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
关键词
clinical trial; randomization; baseline covariates; imbalance; cumulative distribution function; minimization; BIASED-COIN DESIGNS; RANDOMIZATION; MINIMIZATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/sim.5363
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Covariate adaptive allocation is often adopted in sequential clinical trials to maintain the balance of baseline covariates that could potentially confound the outcome of a trial. Several allocation methods exist in the literature that can handle both continuous and categorical covariates. We propose a minimization approach to maintaining the balance of multiple continuous and categorical covariates in sequential clinical trials, which uses the area between the empirical cumulative distribution functions of the observed covariate values as the imbalance metric. Numerical results based on extensive simulation studies and a real dataset show that the proposed approach produces more accurate estimates of the treatment effect and leads to more powerful trials than the existing approaches for trials with binary, continuous, and time-to-event outcomes. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1961 / 1971
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs [J].
Atkinson, AC .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2003, 4 (02) :179-193
[2]   The comparison of designs for sequential clinical trials with covariate information [J].
Atkinson, AC .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2002, 165 :349-373
[3]  
Atkinson AC, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1741, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1741::AID-SIM210>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-F
[5]   Quantifying the cost in power of ignoring continuous covariate imbalances in clinical trial randomization [J].
Ciolino, Jody ;
Zhao, Wenle ;
Martin, Renee' ;
Palesch, Yuko .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 32 (02) :250-259
[6]   FORCING A SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENT TO BE BALANCED [J].
EFRON, B .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (03) :403-&
[7]   Minimization method for balancing continuous prognostic variables between treatment and control groups using Kullback-Leibler divergence [J].
Endo, Akira ;
Nagatani, Furnio ;
Hamada, Chikuma ;
Yoshimura, Isao .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 27 (05) :420-431
[8]  
Frane JW, 1998, DRUG INF J, V32, P423, DOI 10.1177/009286159803200213
[9]   Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials [J].
Heritier, S ;
Gebski, V ;
Pillai, A .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (24) :3729-3741
[10]   EVALUATION OF PROTOCOL CHANGE IN BURN-CARE MANAGEMENT USING THE COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL WITH TIME-DEPENDENT COVARIATES [J].
ICHIDA, JM ;
WASSELL, JT ;
KELLER, MD ;
AYERS, LW .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (3-4) :301-310