Medical device development practices: Empirical survey and legal implications

被引:0
作者
Holley, LK [1 ]
Hughes, CF [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Sci, Ctr Biomed Technol, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 20, PTS 1-6: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TOWARDS THE YEAR 2000 AND BEYOND | 1998年 / 20卷
关键词
medical devices; experimental; safety; development standards; legal standards; ethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Safety concerns relating to medical devices have been raised through recent failures of heart valves, breast implants and pacemaker leads. Under common law in Australia persons engaged in the provision of medical care are under a duty to disclose fully and frankly, risks associated with any medical treatment including those associated with new medical devices. A study via anonymous questionnaire was undertaken to determine the engineering, testing and regulatory criteria and practices currently followed by developers of new medical technologies. While some good engineering practices such as design specifications, design control and fail-safe tests are normally adopted, (86%, 64%, and 64% respectively), inadequate numbers had written functional specifications (18%), conducted a risk/benefit analysis (29%) or documentation control (47%). Only 45% of respondents indicated they had any education or training in product development methodologies for medical devices. While low numbers engaged independent testers of their device (28-45%), a much higher number (80%) wanted independent safety reviews if they were the device recipients. The results raise concerns about the ethical standards being followed and suggest that current development and risk management practices may not meet statutory requirements or the common law standard of care to disclose risks.
引用
收藏
页码:3327 / 3330
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] *AUSTR FED CONS OR, 1984, DEADL NEGL REG MAN T
  • [2] CALLAWAY A, 1997, INTRO PROGRAM TRACKI
  • [3] *CONF ASS BRNCH, 1998, DR4
  • [4] GAD SC, 1997, SAFETY EVALUATION ME
  • [5] GROSS B, 1991, AUSTR PRODUCT LIABIL, V2, P1
  • [6] GROSS B, 1991, AUSTR PRODUCT LIABIL, V2, P16
  • [7] JONAS H, 1969, DAEDALUS, V98, P219
  • [8] *NHMRC, 1982, NHMRC STAT HUM EXP S
  • [9] 1996, REPORT 1996 EVALUATI