Life Cycle Assessment of a building using Open-LCA software

被引:18
|
作者
Pamu, Yashwanth [1 ]
Kumar, V. S. S. [2 ,3 ]
Shakir, Mohammad Abdul [4 ]
Ubbana, Hemanjali [4 ]
机构
[1] CVR Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Ibrahimpatnam, Telangana, India
[2] Govt India, NITTTR, SNIST & Chairman, Kakinada, India
[3] JNTUK, Kakinada, India
[4] CVR Coll Engn, Bachelor Technol, Civil Engn, Ibrahimpatnam 500008, Telangana, India
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Green House Gas; Carbon footprint; Alternate building materials; Sustainable building; Environmental impacts; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.621
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Building Construction industry has high energy consumption and is the major contributor for the environmental impacts like ozone depletion, Green House Gas emissions, Carbon foot print etc. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of buildings is a method to evaluate the environmental impacts generated by building throughout its life cycle. This paper presents a case study of a G + 5 residential building in a metropolitan city of India and determines the impacts on the environment resulting from the construction phase using Open-LCA software. The Life Cycle Assessment software gives the impacts caused on the environment due to all components and the materials used in construction. The common building materials used in construction are clay brick, aggregates, cement, and steel. Therefore, this paper evaluates the environmental impact by using common building materials and alternate building materials. The comparative results of reduction in environmental impact are presented and attempted to develop sustainable building construction.Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Developments in Materials, Manufacturing and Energy Engineering
引用
收藏
页码:1968 / 1978
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and degradable polymers
    Grant, Tim
    ACS Symposium Series, 2012, 1114 : 45 - 58
  • [32] International Survey of the Usage of Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Software
    Sartori, Thais
    Drogemuller, Robin
    Omrani, Sara
    Lamari, Fiona
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [33] Comparative study of heat pump system and biomass boiler system to a tertiary building using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Lozano Miralles, Jose Adolfo
    Lopez Garcia, Rafael
    Palomar Carnicero, Jose Manuel
    Rey Martinez, Francisco Javier
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 152 : 1439 - 1450
  • [34] The influence of databases on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of building components - A comparison of databases using three different wall constructions
    Mahler, P.
    Schneider, P.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 967 - 974
  • [35] THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) FOR SELECTING SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS IN RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXES IN TEHRAN
    Divandari, Javad
    Najari, Farbod
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DESIGN ART AND COMMUNICATION, 2016, 6 : 2155 - 2167
  • [36] ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA - A new open source software for Life Cycle Assessment
    Ciroth, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04): : 209 - 210
  • [37] ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA — A new open source software for life cycle assessment
    Andreas Ciroth
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 209 - 210
  • [38] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [39] ABC LCA-booklet: life cycle assessment of structures using an example
    Dombrowski, Max
    Kanz, Emma
    Wolgast, Katharina
    BAUTECHNIK, 2025, 102 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [40] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) AS A TOOL FOR BUSINESS STRATEGY
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    Luz, Leila Mendes
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2014, 5 (03): : 733 - 751