SETTING HEALTH-CARE PRIORITIES: A REPLY TO MASSIMO REICHLIN

被引:0
作者
Tannsjo, Torbjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Philosophy, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
DIAMETROS | 2021年 / 18卷 / 70期
关键词
priority setting; prioritarianism; assisted reproduction; disability; enhancement;
D O I
10.33392/diam.1779
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This is a short reply to Professor Reichlin's comment on my book Setting Health-Care Priorities. What Ethical Theories Tell Its. The version of prioritarianism I rely on in the book is defended as the most plausible one. The general claim that there is convergence between all plausible theories on distributive justice is also defended with regard to assisted reproduction, disability, and enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 81
页数:4
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] McKerlie D., 2013, Justice between the young and the old
  • [2] PRIORITARIANISM IN HEALTH-CARE: RESISTING THE REDUCTION TO UTILITARIANISM
    Reichlin, Massimo
    [J]. DIAMETROS, 2021, 18 (69): : 20 - 32