The new drug approvals of 1999, 2000, and 2001: Drug development trends a decade after passage of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992

被引:13
作者
Kaitin, KI [1 ]
Cairns, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Ctr Study Drug Dev, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL | 2003年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
new chemical entity; drug development; pharmaceutical innovation; pharmaceutical industry; Food and Drug Administration; Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992; FDA Modernization Act of 1997;
D O I
10.1177/009286150303700403
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This report is the sixth in a triennial series by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development examining various aspects of recent new drug approvals in the United States. In 1999, 2000, and 2001 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research approved 86 new drugs, 82 of which met the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development's definition of a new chemical entity (NCE). Of the 82, 34 (41 %) received priority review, while 48 (59%) had standard review. The mean length of the clinical phase (Investigational New Drug Application [IND] filing to New Drug Application [NDA] submission) for the 82 NCEs was 5.5 years, and the mean approval phase (NDA submission to approval) was 1.4 years. Whereas the clinical phase represents a 14 % decrease from that value for the previous three-year period, the approval phase remained unchanged. The mean approval phase for priority NCEs (0.9 years) was half that for standard NCEs (L 8 years). Of the 75 NCEs for which foreign marketing data were available, 51 % were first approved for marketing in the United States, while 27% were available in foreign markets one or more years prior to United States approval, with a mean of 6.5 years of prior foreign marketing. The percentage of products first approved in the United States represents a continuation of a trend since passage of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 of drug sponsors seeking marketing approval in the United States prior to approval in other markets.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 371
页数:15
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs [J].
DiMasi, JA ;
Hansen, RW ;
Grabowski, HG .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (02) :151-185
[2]   The value of improving the productivity of the drug development process - Faster times and better decisions [J].
DiMasi, JA .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (Suppl 3) :1-10
[3]   New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1999 [J].
DiMasi, JA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 69 (05) :286-296
[4]  
Kaitin K I, 1997, Am J Ther, V4, P46, DOI 10.1097/00045391-199701000-00010
[5]   THE NEW DRUG APPROVALS OF 1990, 1991, AND 1992 - TRENDS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT [J].
KAITIN, KI ;
MANOCCHIA, M ;
SEIBRING, M ;
LASAGNA, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 34 (02) :120-127
[6]   TRENDS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT - THE 1985-86 NEW DRUG APPROVALS [J].
KAITIN, KI ;
RICHARD, BW ;
LASAGNA, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 27 (08) :542-548
[7]   THE NEW DRUG APPROVALS OF 1987, 1988, AND 1989 - TRENDS IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT [J].
KAITIN, KI ;
DICERBO, PA ;
LASAGNA, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 31 (02) :116-122
[8]  
Kaitin KI, 2000, DRUG INF J, V34, P1
[9]  
PFIZER RD, 2002, PINK SHEET, V64, P15
[10]  
Reichert Janice M, 2002, Am J Ther, V9, P543, DOI 10.1097/00045391-200211000-00016