Dynamic Behavior Comparison of Steel-Composite and Concrete High Speed Railway Bridges

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Sung Il [2 ]
Lee, Jungwhee [1 ]
Kim, Sungkon [3 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Gyeonggi 448701, South Korea
[2] Korea Railrd Res Inst, Dept Track & Civil Engn, Gyeonggi 437757, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Seoul 139743, South Korea
关键词
high speed railway bridge; bridge-train interaction; moving load; dynamic response; critical velocity; MODAL PARAMETERS; TRAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s13296-011-4005-8
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The dynamic behavior of two steel bridges crossed by the Korean High Speed Train (KTX) has been investigated experimentally and the results are compared with the specification requirement and other typical prestressed concrete box girder bridge's responses. The investigated bridges are two 2-girder steel bridges, one of 1@40 m span length, and the other of 2@50 m span length, and a PSC Box girder bridge of 2@40 m span length. A set of experimental tests were performed during the operation of KTX, and a number of accelerometers, LVDTs and ring-type displacement transducers were utilized for measurement of three kinds of dynamic responses (acceleration, deflection, and end-rotation angle). Measured responses show that the vertical deflections and end-rotation angles of the three bridges all satisfy the spec. requirement with a large margin, but acceleration responses were also found to be very close to, or exceeded, the limit value. It was found that most of the excessive acceleration responses occurred when the passing speed of the train is close to the critical velocity which causes resonance. No noticeable differences of dynamic responses due to the different materials (steel or concrete) could be found within these experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 455
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STATICAL BEHAVIOR AND ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURE WITH GROUPED STUDS IN RAILWAY BRIDGES
    Hou Wenqi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSPECTION APPRAISAL REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2010, : 437 - 445
  • [32] OVERLOAD BEHAVIOR OF COMPOSITE STEEL-CONCRETE BRIDGES - DISCUSSION
    SMITH, JC
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1978, 104 (05): : 880 - 882
  • [33] DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR AND DAMPING OF STEEL RAILWAY BRIDGES AT A SPEED OF 200 KM/H
    Ryjáček, Pavel
    Polák, Michal
    Dynybyl, Vojtěch
    Litoš, Jiří
    ce/papers, 2024, 7 (3-4) : 111 - 114
  • [34] Structure and behavior of floor system of two super high-speed railway Changjiang composite bridges
    Zhang Ye-zhi
    Zhang Min
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02): : 542 - 549
  • [35] Structure and behavior of floor system of two super high-speed railway Changjiang composite bridges
    张晔芝
    张敏
    Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2011, 18 (02) : 542 - 549
  • [36] Structure and behavior of floor system of two super high-speed railway Changjiang composite bridges
    Ye-zhi Zhang
    Min Zhang
    Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18 : 542 - 549
  • [37] Steel-composite bridges - holistic approach applied to European Case Studies
    Maier, P.
    Kuhlmann, U.
    Tardivel, Y.
    Robert, N.
    Raoul, J.
    Perdigao, V.
    Martins, N.
    Barros, P.
    Friedrich, H.
    Krieger, J.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT, RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, : 1809 - 1815
  • [38] Calculation of Dynamic Amplification Factor for Railway Concrete and Masonry Arch Bridges Subjected to High-speed Trains
    Azimi, Peyman
    Yazdani, Mandi
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 66 (03): : 876 - 890
  • [39] Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of railway bridges for high-speed traffic
    Calcada, R.
    MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, RISK, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGES, 2018, : 36 - 53
  • [40] Temperature effect on service performance of high-speed railway concrete bridges
    Tian, Y.
    Zhang, N.
    Xia, H.
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 20 (06) : 865 - 883